Bitcoin is a type of digital money that people can buy and sell. Its value goes up and down sometimes, just like regular money in a bank account. Recently, the value of Bitcoin went down by more than 3% in one day, which means people had to pay less for it than before. This happened after the value of Bitcoin also went down by 3% in the past week. The amount of Bitcoin that is being used and traded has gone up a little bit, but not as much as its total supply. Bitcoin is still considered very valuable and is the most popular digital money out there. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalized, implying that Bitcoin has decreased more than 3% within 24 hours, which is not true according to the first sentence of the article. A more accurate and informative title would be "Bitcoin's Price Movement: A Weekly Overview".
2. The use of Bollinger Bands to measure volatility is questionable, as they are typically used for technical analysis and not for comparing different time frames. A better alternative would be to use a standard deviation calculation based on the historical price data.
3. The article does not provide any context or explanation for why Bitcoin's price has decreased over the past week, nor does it mention any relevant market factors or trends that may have influenced the price movement. A more comprehensive and insightful analysis would include a discussion of the recent regulatory developments, adoption news, network growth, or security incidents affecting Bitcoin and its ecosystem.
4. The article does not cite any sources or data providers for the information presented, such as the price, volume, circulating supply, market cap, or Bollinger Bands. This raises questions about the accuracy and reliability of the data, as well as the credibility of the source. A more transparent and accountable article would provide links to the original data sources and indicate any potential biases or limitations.
5. The article ends with a promotional paragraph for Benzinga Pro, which is irrelevant and distracting for the readers who are interested in learning about Bitcoin's price movement. A more ethical and professional article would either remove this paragraph or disclose the affiliation between the author and Benzinga Pro, as well as the potential benefits or conflicts of interest that may arise from promoting their service.