A person who knows a lot about cars and computers says that Tesla is going to be very good at making cars that can drive by themselves. Even though it may take some time for these cars to be available for everyone, the person thinks that they will make life better by helping people get around more easily, work faster, and be safer on the roads. Different companies have different ways of making self-driving cars, but Tesla has its own special way of doing it, which this person believes is a good thing. Read from source...

1. The analyst does not subscribe to the rumor that the company has shelved the sub-$30,000 EV. This is an arbitrary and unsubstantiated claim that lacks any evidence or logical connection to the rest of the article. It seems like a desperate attempt to create doubt and fear among investors and customers who are waiting for Tesla's affordable offering.
2. The analyst reposes confidence in the technology, but does not provide any specific examples or data to support his claims. He uses vague terms such as "improve resource utilization", "enhance human productivity", "decongest highways", etc., without explaining how or why these benefits will materialize or how they are measured.
3. The analyst acknowledges the challenges and setbacks faced by Tesla's full-self driving software suite, but dismisses them as temporary and inevitable. He ignores the possibility that the technology might not work as expected or might face legal or ethical issues. He also does not consider the alternative solutions or competitors that might emerge or surpass Tesla in this field.
4. The analyst compares Tesla's approach to other companies, but fails to compare them on a fair and objective basis. He uses subjective terms such as "controversial", "different", "hybrid" without defining or explaining what they mean or how they affect the performance or value of the technology.
5. The analyst concludes that Tesla will be a leader in autonomy, despite acknowledging its extended deployment timetables and slow progress. He does not provide any quantitative or qualitative criteria to justify his claim or to compare Tesla's leadership position with other players in the market.
6. The analyst seems to have a strong personal bias towards Tesla and Elon Musk, as he uses their names multiple times throughout the article and praises them without any critical evaluation. He also does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest or financial incentives that might influence his analysis or recommendations.