This is a story about the boss of Disney, Bob Iger. He said that his company had to cancel some movie projects because they were not good enough. This happened because fewer people went to watch movies in theaters lately. Some people who own parts of Disney are not happy and want changes in how the company is run. But Bob Iger thinks that making really great movies will make people come back to theaters, not just okay movies. Read from source...

1. The headline is misleading and exaggerated, as it implies that several projects have been canceled because of a box office slump, when in reality, Iger only mentioned that some projects were axed due to not being strong enough. This creates a sense of panic and negativity among the readers, without providing a balanced perspective on Disney's overall performance and strategy.
2. The article repeats the same information multiple times, such as mentioning the box office downturn, Iger's statement about killing things, and the need for perfection. This makes the text redundant and inefficient, as it does not provide any new insights or analysis on the topic. A better approach would be to use transitions and paragraph breaks to organize the information more logically and coherently.
3. The article fails to mention any positive aspects of Disney's recent developments, such as the confirmation of an "Avatar"-based land at Disneyland Resort, which could indicate a promising future for the company's theme parks division. This creates a one-sided and pessimistic view of Disney's situation, without acknowledging its potential for growth and innovation in other areas.
4. The article uses emotional language and tone, such as "setbacks", "activist investors are pushing for changes", and "Iger believes that the key to success lies in creating great films". These expressions convey a sense of urgency and drama, which may appeal to some readers, but also distort the reality and facts about Disney's current state. A more objective and factual tone would be more appropriate for an informative article like this one.