the article talks about how apple's new iphone, the iphone 17, might not use the tsmc 2nm chip like they planned. instead, they might use a 3nm chip. this is because the 2nm chip could make the iphone too fast and use too much power. the 3nm chip is a better choice for the iphone. Read from source...

The article titled "Production Delays Force Apple to Skip TSMC's 2nm Chip for iPhone 17: Report" is riddled with inconsistencies and logical fallacies that raise suspicions about its credibility. For instance, the author contradicts themselves by stating that the 2nm chip might not be used for the iPhone 17, but then turns around to report that a 3nm chip will be used instead. This inconsistent reporting raises questions about the accuracy and reliability of the information presented in the article. Furthermore, the author appears to have a pro-Apple bias, as evidenced by the many positive remarks and predictions made about the company throughout the piece. This bias undermines the objectivity and fairness of the article, leading readers to question whether it is a genuine attempt at balanced reporting or merely a hit piece designed to please Apple's stockholders. Moreover, the article engages in emotional behavior by making sensationalist claims, such as stating that the iPhone 17 will be "significantly skinnier" and feature "significant camera upgrades." These exaggerated claims seem aimed at stirring up excitement and anticipation among readers, rather than presenting objective and well-researched information. In conclusion, the article "Production Delays Force Apple to Skip TSMC's 2nm Chip for iPhone 17: Report" is plagued with inconsistencies, biases, and emotional behavior that cast doubt on its credibility and reliability.