So, Elon Musk is the boss of a company called Tesla that makes cars and robots. He says that one day, robots can make other robots by themselves. He showed a video of a robot called Optimus that can do some tasks like folding clothes, but it still can't find a lost sock. Elon Musk thinks this is something robots will be able to do in the future. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and exaggerated. It implies that Elon Musk said something impossible or absurd about robots building other robots, but he actually expressed optimism and confidence in the future of robotics. A more accurate title would be "Elon Musk Envisions a Future Where Robots Can Build Other Robots".
2. The article uses vague terms like "inevitable" and "seems inevitable" without providing any evidence or reasoning to support them. These are subjective opinions, not facts, and they do not convey the uncertainty and complexity of the topic. A more objective and nuanced approach would be to explain what factors or challenges might make robots building other robots possible or impossible, such as technological limitations, ethical issues, market demand, etc.
3. The article focuses too much on Tesla's Optimus project and Musk's personal comments, while ignoring the broader context of robotics research and development. There are many other companies and organizations working on different types of robots for various purposes, such as Boston Dynamics, OpenAI, Google, etc. The article should acknowledge this diversity and competition, and how it might affect Tesla's position and strategy in the market.
4. The article uses humor and sarcasm to mock Musk's remarks about finding a missing sock, implying that he is naive or clueless about the capabilities and challenges of AI and robotics. However, this misses the point that Musk was making a rhetorical device to illustrate how far robots have come and how much more they can improve in the future. He was not seriously claiming that finding a missing sock is impossible, but rather that it is a trivial task compared to building other robots. The article should respect this intention and tone, and not dismiss or ridicule him for it.