The article says that even though the price of a special type of computer money called Chainlink went down a lot, some really big people and companies who have a lot of these computer money tokens are still buying them. This might mean that Chainlink is going to be really valuable in the future. Right now, Chainlink is not very expensive, but some people think it will change and be valuable soon. Read from source...

The article lacks a clear narrative structure and suffers from information overload. It tries to discuss multiple topics within a single article, leading to a lack of coherence and flow. Additionally, it seems to be pushing a specific agenda, favoring the bullish outlook for LINK, despite significant downward pressure. The data presented in the article seems to be selectively cherry-picked, without proper context or counterarguments, to support the author's narrative. It also tends to rely heavily on third-party sources, such as Lookonchain and IntoTheBlock, for data interpretation, leading to potential confirmation biases. Overall, the article lacks critical analysis, depth, and nuance, resorting to superficial observations and anecdotal evidence.