Some people think that Sundar Pichai, the boss of Google, should not be the boss anymore because they believe he is not doing a good job. They say that Google needs to change how it works and maybe get a new boss who can help them do better in the future with things like AI (artificial intelligence). Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalist, implying that there is a widespread call for Pichai to step down, while in reality it only mentions two analysts who have expressed such views. This creates a false impression of consensus or urgency among the experts, which may influence readers' opinions without providing them with sufficient evidence or context.
- The article relies on anecdotal examples and recent events to support its claim that Google needs a transformation under new leadership. However, it does not provide any comprehensive analysis of Google's overall performance, strategy, innovation, or competitive advantage in the AI era. It also ignores other factors that may have contributed to these incidents, such as internal communication issues, external pressure, or human error.
- The article fails to acknowledge the positive aspects and achievements of Pichai's leadership, such as Google's massive growth under his tenure, its dominance in various markets, its ethical principles for AI development, and its commitment to social responsibility. It also does not compare Pichai's performance with that of other tech leaders or potential successors, nor does it offer any concrete suggestions or criteria for selecting a new CEO.
- The article uses emotional language and hyperbole to convey its message, such as "struggles", "missteps", "error", "bureaucratic hurdles", "saga", etc. These words imply that Google is in crisis, chaos, or decline, which may influence readers' perception of the company's reputation and future prospects. They also create a sense of urgency and dissatisfaction among readers, which may affect their loyalty or trust in Google as a consumer or investor.