A company called Uber helps people get rides and food from their phones. Some big investors, or "whales", own a lot of shares of this company. The article talks about how these whales are making decisions about the company's stock. It also says that in 7 days, we will learn how much money Uber made in the past few months. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalized, as it implies that only whales are involved with UBER, while in reality many smaller investors and users also have stakes or interests in the company.
- The article does not provide any clear definition of what constitutes a "whale" in this context, nor how they differ from other types of investors or users. This creates confusion and ambiguity for readers who may not be familiar with the terminology or the market dynamics.
- The article focuses too much on UBER's current price and volume, without giving enough context or analysis to explain why these metrics are relevant or indicative of the company's performance or prospects. For example, it does not mention how UBER compares to its competitors, peers, or industry benchmarks, nor how it has evolved over time or what factors have influenced its growth or decline.
- The article also lacks depth and insight into UBER's business model, strategy, innovation, challenges, opportunities, or vision for the future. It simply regurgitates some of the company's features and services, without evaluating their effectiveness, profitability, scalability, or sustainability. It also does not address any of the controversies, scandals, lawsuits, or regulatory issues that have plagued UBER in the past or present, nor how they affect its reputation, credibility, or viability.
- The article ends with a vague and generic summary of expert opinions on UBER, without providing any specific sources, quotes, data, or arguments to support their views. It also does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest, biases, or motives that may influence the experts' opinions or ratings. It also does not contrast or compare these opinions with other relevant or contradictory perspectives, nor how they align or diverge from the company's own claims, goals, or performance.