So, this article talks about some very rich people who are betting their money on a company called On Holding. They think the company will do well and they can make more money from it. Most of these rich people have a positive view on the company, which means they believe it will go up in value. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalized, implying that whales are exclusively betting on On Holding, which is not true. Whales may invest in other stocks or assets as well. A more accurate title would be "Some Whales Are Betting on On Holding".
2. The article does not provide any evidence or sources for the claims made about whale activity and their implications for On Holding's performance. Where are the trade data, the option contracts, the insider information? A more credible article would cite such information to support its assertions.
3. The article uses vague terms like "bullish" and "whales" without defining them or explaining how they are measured. For example, what constitutes a whale investor, and how is bullish sentiment determined? A more informative article would clarify these concepts and provide some metrics or benchmarks to compare them across different stocks or time periods.
4. The article does not consider any alternative explanations or potential conflicts of interest that may influence the whales' behavior or the market dynamics. For example, are the whales acting on insider knowledge, or are they being influenced by external factors like media hype, social trends, or regulatory changes? A more objective article would explore these possibilities and acknowledge any limitations or uncertainties in its analysis.