A big person who helped sell special glasses called Vision Pro at Apple is leaving the company. He worked there for a very long time and helped make the iPhone popular with different phone companies. But not many people want to buy these glasses now, so he is going away. Read from source...

1. The headline is misleading and exaggerated. It implies that the departure of Casanova is the main reason for the slump in demand, while ignoring other possible factors such as customer satisfaction, competition, price, etc. A more accurate headline would be "Apple's Top Marketer For Vision Pro Leaves After 36 Years Amid Uncertain Market Conditions".
2. The article relies heavily on quotes from Casanova and his colleagues, but does not provide any data or analysis to support their claims. For example, it mentions the drop in demand for the headset, but does not show how much it has declined, or compare it with other similar products. It also does not explain why the demand is slumping, or what Apple is doing to address it.
3. The article uses emotional language and tone, such as "bids farewell", "departed", "pivotal role", etc., to evoke sympathy and nostalgia for Casanova, while downplaying the challenges and risks of the headset business. A more objective and balanced approach would be to acknowledge both the achievements and the difficulties that Casanova faced, and to present the current situation as a normal part of Apple's innovation cycle, not a crisis.
4. The article focuses too much on Casanova's personal story, rather than the overall performance and potential of the Vision Pro headset. It does not provide any details about the features, benefits, or customer feedback of the product, nor how it fits into Apple's strategy and vision for the future. A more informative and engaging article would be to highlight the innovations and opportunities that the headset offers, as well as the challenges and threats that it faces from competitors and market conditions.