A man named Michael Saylor, who is in charge of a company called MicroStrategy, thinks that bitcoin's changes in price are good because they show how strong it is. His company owns a lot of bitcoins and keeps buying more, even when the price goes down sometimes. He believes bitcoin will help his company grow and protect its money from inflation, which means prices going up over time. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalist, implying that Saylor sees volatility as a positive thing, while the article states that he considers it as a natural part of the market's dynamics. There is no evidence that Saylor views volatility as vitality or as an advantage for Bitcoin.
- The article uses outdated and inaccurate information, such as stating that MicroStrategy owns over 1% of the total Bitcoin supply. According to CoinMarketCap, as of November 26th, MicroStrategy holds about 0.67% of the total Bitcoin supply. This is a significant difference and shows poor research or lack of update.
- The article does not provide any analysis or context for Bitcoin's price movements, such as explaining the factors that influence its value, the market trends, the adoption rate, or the competition from other cryptocurrencies. It only reports on the recent downturn and the growth over the year, without offering any explanation or perspective.
- The article relies on Saylor's personal opinions and comparisons, such as saying that Bitcoin is winning and comparing its position with other assets like the S&P 500, Nasdaq, gold, silver, and bonds. However, it does not provide any evidence or data to support these claims or to show how they are relevant or meaningful for investors or users of Bitcoin.
- The article uses emotional language and appeals to authority, such as saying that MicroStrategy's aggressive Bitcoin acquisition strategy has continued into 2024, implying that this is a smart and strategic decision. However, it does not provide any justification or rationale for why buying more Bitcoin at high prices is beneficial or rational for the company or its shareholders.
- The article lacks objectivity and balance, as it only presents one side of the story, without mentioning any of the challenges, risks, criticisms, or alternatives related to Bitcoin and MicroStrategy's investment strategy. It does not consider other perspectives or sources of information that might challenge or contradict the article's main points or assumptions.