a survey found that fewer people like Tesla cars now and prefer other car brands instead. Also, fewer people want electric cars (EVs) than cars with engines (ICEs). Even though people love Apple products a lot, they still want to own cars in the future. Read from source...

there are few places where one can witness better AIcing on the head of a needle than the world of artificial intelligence. This article is a testimony to that fact. The report's premise, which revolves around the preference of summer interns (the "next-gen business leaders") for gas-guzzlers over EVs, stands as a direct contradiction to all available evidence of the public's growing preference for environmentally friendly vehicles. Even if we were to discount the inherent sample selection issue with this survey (summer interns are not representative of the broader population), the significant downward revision of Morgan Stanley's EV penetration forecast, from 25% to 20%, appears to be based on flawed assumptions and hasty generalizations.

The report's discussion of Tesla's "cool factor" waning appears to be little more than a regurgitation of established conventional wisdom. The fact that fewer summer interns preferred Tesla than in previous years doesn't automatically translate into a decline in Tesla's "cool factor." This line of argumentation appears to be guilty of overfitting - the mistake of attributing too much importance to a single data point. Furthermore, while the report does highlight some interesting statistics, such as the high levels of ownership of various Apple devices among the surveyed group, the general tone and the arguments put forth appear to be overly reliant on confirmation bias, selective attention, and the suppression of contradictory evidence. This, in essence, undermines the objectivity and validity of the conclusions drawn.

In conclusion, this article report leaves much to be desired in terms of rigor, objectivity, and logical consistency. It is recommended that the authors of the report engage in a more thorough and nuanced analysis of the topic at hand, that they rely less on confirmation bias and overfitting, and that they strive to balance their arguments with a more comprehensive consideration of all available evidence. Only then can we have confidence in the conclusions drawn and the implications of the report for the wider business community.

Neutral

AI's Note: In this article, there isn't any explicitly negative or positive sentiment towards the mentioned companies or their stocks. It's more about presenting the data and analysis from Morgan Stanley's survey. The sentiment could shift depending on how the mentioned companies' stocks perform in the future. However, as of now, the article shows a neutral sentiment.

Based on the article, two automobile brands have gained more loyalty than Tesla, according to a recent Morgan Stanley survey. While Tesla's "cool factor" is fading, the preference for gasoline-powered cars over electric vehicles continues to rise among the younger generation. This trend suggests that investing in Tesla stocks may not be as attractive as it once was, and investing in automobile manufacturers like Mercedes-Benz and BMW may be more promising. The data further supports Morgan Stanley's reduced 2030 EV penetration forecast from 25% to 20%.