Apple is a big company that makes iPhones and other gadgets. Some people who own parts of Apple, called shareholders, want to know more about how Apple uses artificial intelligence (AI), which is like smart computer programs that can learn and think. The shareholders asked Apple to tell them more about AI in a meeting. But Apple's leaders said no, because they think it might give their competitors an advantage if they know too much. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalist. It implies that Apple has something to hide about its AI use, or that it is facing external pressure from shareholders and competitors. This creates a false sense of intrigue and curiosity for the readers, without providing any concrete evidence or facts to support such claims.
- The article content is poorly structured and organized. It jumps from one topic to another without clear transitions or explanations. For example, it mentions the five shareholder proposals in one paragraph, but does not elaborate on what they are or why they matter. It also switches from discussing AI usage to privacy and human rights issues, without showing how they are related or connected.
- The article uses vague and ambiguous terms to describe AI usage. For example, it says that Apple should compile a "transparency report" on its AI use, but does not define what transparency means in this context, or what criteria or metrics would be used to measure it. It also does not specify how AI is being used by Apple, or for what purposes or benefits. This makes the article sound like a vague and generic call for more information, without providing any specific or meaningful insights.
- The article relies on unreliable and biased sources to support its claims. For example, it cites Apple's SEC filing as the main source of evidence, but does not provide any quotes or excerpts from the document. It also cites the AFL-CIO Equity Index Funds as the sole proponent of the shareholder proposal, without mentioning any other stakeholders or perspectives. This creates a one-sided and incomplete picture of the issue, without considering any alternative or opposing views.
- The article ends with an inconclusive and unsatisfying conclusion. It states that Apple warns of competition risks, but does not explain what these are, how they affect Apple's AI strategy, or how Apple plans to address them. It also does not address the shareholders' concerns or expectations, or how Apple intends to respond to their proposal. This leaves the reader with more questions than answers, and a sense of confusion and frustration.

1. Apple Inc.'s annual shareholder meeting will be held on Wednesday, with five proposals from shareholders covering various topics.
2. One proposal seeks transparency regarding AI usage by Apple, requested by the AFL-CIO Equity Index Funds.