So, there is this website called Benzinga that tells people which stocks are very popular today. They wrote an article about five different stocks that many people are interested in buying or selling. The article talks about why these stocks are important and what happened to their prices during the day. Read from source...

1. The author uses vague terms and generalizations such as "gained the attention of retail traders and investors" without providing any evidence or data to support this claim. This is an example of a weak argument that relies on assumptions rather than facts.
2. The article does not provide any context or background information about the stocks mentioned, which makes it difficult for readers to understand why these particular stocks are relevant or important. For instance, what is Paramount Global and what is its connection to the stock market? Why should investors care about Qualcomm's performance?
3. The article focuses on short-term price fluctuations rather than long-term trends or fundamentals. This can be misleading for readers who are looking for more insightful analysis and guidance on their investment decisions. For example, the author mentions that Paramount Global's stock closed at 6.65%, but does not explain what this percentage means or how it affects the company's value or profitability.
4. The article includes personal opinions and anecdotes from unnamed sources, such as "Byron Allen ha" (presumably a quote from the media mogul). These statements do not contribute to the credibility or objectivity of the article, and may even undermine its authority by suggesting that the author has personal biases or agendas.
5. The article ends with a disclaimer that "these are the top stocks that gained the attention of retail traders and investors throughout the day", which contradicts the previous statements about why these stocks are on investors' radars today. This creates confusion and inconsistency in the author's argument, and leaves readers questioning the validity and reliability of the information presented.
6. The article does not provide any actionable advice or recommendations for readers who are interested in investing in these stocks. Instead, it simply lists them as "trending" without explaining how or why they might be profitable or worthwhile investments. This leaves readers feeling unsatisfied and uninformed about the potential risks and rewards of each stock.