A big car company called General Motors wants to compete with Chinese companies that make electric cars. They want a fair chance and not have the Chinese cars be cheaper just because they are from China. The American government has made it harder for these Chinese cars to come to America by making them pay more money in taxes. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalist, implying that GM's president is against Chinese EV companies as a whole, rather than just their unfair pricing strategy. A more accurate title would be "GM's President Calls Out China's Unfair Pricing Strategy in Electric Vehicle Market".
2. The article claims that China's lower-priced products might force local players out of the market, but does not provide any evidence or data to support this claim. This is a logical fallacy known as "post hoc ergo propter hoc", which means "after this, therefore because of this". Just because something happened after another thing doesn't mean it was caused by it.
3. The article mentions that several Chinese EV players have stayed out of the American market due to high tariffs and tensions between the two countries, but does not acknowledge the role of the U.S. government in imposing these tariffs and creating this hostile environment. This is a case of "shifting the blame" or "ignoring counterfactuals".
4. The article quotes Reuss as saying that China's pricing strategy is not even about their supply chain, but doesn't explain what he means by that or provide any examples or analysis to back up this claim. This is a case of "argument from ignorance" or "appeal to authority", where the writer assumes that because Reuss said it, it must be true without verifying its validity or accuracy.
5. The article ends with a statistic about GM's electric vehicle sales in the U.S., but does not put it into context or relate it to the main topic of the article. This is a case of "red herring", where the writer introduces irrelevant information to distract from the main point or confuse the reader.

To answer your question, I will analyze the article you provided and give my opinion on which stocks are worth buying or selling based on their current performance and future prospects. I will also explain the main factors that could affect the profitability of these companies in the short and long term, such as market trends, regulations, competition, and geopolitical issues. Here are my recommendations:

- GM: Buy. The company is launching a new electric vehicle, the Chevrolet Equinox EV, to compete with Tesla Model Y and other Chinese EV makers. This could boost its market share and revenue in the U.S. and global markets, especially if it can price its products competitively and maintain quality standards. GM has a strong brand reputation, advanced technology, and diversified product portfolio that could help it gain an edge over its rivals. However, there are some risks involved, such as the potential impact of higher tariffs on Chinese EV imports, which could hurt consumer demand and increase costs for domestic producers. Additionally, GM faces intense competition from Tesla and other established players, such as Ford and Volkswagen, who are also investing heavily in electric vehicles and batteries. Therefore, GM needs to continue innovating and improving its products and services to retain its customers and attract new ones.
- BYD: Sell. The company is one of the leading Chinese EV makers, with a large market share and production capacity in China. However, it has not entered the U.S. market yet, due to the high tariffs and tensions between the two countries. This limits its growth potential and exposes it to geopolitical risks that could further escalate or resolve over time. Moreover, BYD faces stiff competition from other domestic and foreign EV producers, such as NIO, XPeng, and Li Auto, who are offering more attractive and advanced products and features to consumers. Additionally, BYD depends heavily on the government subsidies and incentives for its EV sales, which could be reduced or removed in the future, affecting its profitability and competitiveness. Therefore, BYD is not a good investment option at this time, as it faces multiple challenges and uncertainties that could negatively impact its performance and value.