Some people want to send money from one place to another, and they use a company called Western Union to do that. The company just told everyone how much money they made in the first three months of this year, which is better than what most people thought they would make. This means that more people are using their service to send money, and the company is doing well. Read from source...

- The article starts with an irrelevant and misleading introduction that does not provide any valuable information to the readers or investors. It only serves as a hook to attract attention and does not mention the key metrics that the title suggests.
- The article fails to provide a clear and concise summary of Western Union's Q1 earnings, revenue, EPS, and other financial indicators. Instead, it jumps straight into the details of some selected metrics without contextualizing them or explaining how they relate to the overall performance of the company.
- The article uses vague and ambiguous terms such as "influence", "compare", "help investors project", etc., without defining them or providing any evidence or sources to support their claims. These words are used to create an impression of credibility and expertise, but they do not add any substance or insight to the analysis.
- The article presents some statistics that are either outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate. For example, it uses the year-ago quarter's revenue instead of the most recent one, it does not include the Zacks Consensus Estimate for consumer money transfer transactions, and it rounds off the EPS surprise to +12.50% without mentioning the exact figure or the margin of error.
- The article lacks any critical thinking or objective evaluation of Western Union's performance and results. It simply repeats what Wall Street analysts estimated or predicted, without questioning their methodology, assumptions, or validity. It also does not provide any counterarguments or alternative perspectives that could challenge or complement the main thesis of the article.

Given that Western Union's revenue beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by a wide margin, I would recommend buying the stock for long-term growth potential. The company has shown resilience in the face of the pandemic and continues to benefit from its diversified business model across consumer and business segments. However, there are some risks to consider as well. One is the increasing competition from fintech companies like PayPal (NASDAQ:PYPL) and Square (NYSE:SQ), which offer cheaper and faster alternatives to traditional money transfer services. Another risk is the potential impact of regulatory changes on the company's operations, especially in international markets where Western Union has a significant presence. Therefore, investors should monitor these factors closely and adjust their positions accordingly.