The Department of Justice (DOJ) is unhappy with Apple because they want to control how cars work with their CarPlay system. The DOJ thinks that Apple's rules make it hard for other companies to make things that can work with the car without using an iPhone. Some people think this complaint is not fair, and carmakers don't have to follow all of Apple's rules. Some car companies use both CarPlay and another system from Google, or they use their own systems instead. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that the DOJ is angry with Apple for its CarPlay plan, when in reality, the DOJ filed a lawsuit against Apple over its control of the iPhone's ecosystem and restrictions on third-party apps and services. The DOJ is not specifically targeting CarPlay, but rather the broader issue of App Store policies that affect all developers and users.
2. The article uses vague terms like "power of the iPhone" and "disintermediating technologies" without explaining what they mean or providing any evidence to support these claims. It also relies on a single quote from an analyst who is not directly involved in the case, but rather offers his opinion on the matter.
3. The article does not provide any context or background information about the lawsuit, such as why the DOJ decided to pursue this case now, what are the possible outcomes, and how it could affect consumers and the market in general. It also fails to mention that Apple has already made some concessions and changes to its App Store policies in response to previous legal challenges and regulatory scrutiny from other countries.
4. The article contrasts Apple's CarPlay with rival systems like Android Auto, but does not compare them objectively or provide any data on their respective features, benefits, or user satisfaction. It also implies that automakers who prefer to use their own infotainment systems are somehow avoiding the issue of App Store restrictions, when in fact, they may still be subject to similar limitations and challenges in developing and distributing their software.
5. The article expresses a negative tone and bias against Apple, suggesting that its CarPlay plan is an example of its "lock-in" strategy and anticompetitive behavior. It also ignores the potential benefits and innovations that CarPlay could bring to consumers and the automotive industry, such as improved safety, convenience, and integration between devices.