Microsoft is a big company that makes computers and software. They want to be good at making smart machines called AI, but they need help from another group called OpenAI. Gene Munster is a person who watches companies and he thinks Microsoft needs OpenAI too much. He says Microsoft's future depends on what OpenAI does. This means Microsoft cannot do everything by itself and has to work with OpenAI. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalist. It implies that Microsoft is not in control of its AI destiny like Google and Meta, but it does not provide any evidence or analysis to support this claim.
- The author relies heavily on the opinions of Gene Munster, a former analyst who has been proven wrong many times before. His credibility and expertise are questionable at best. He also appears to have a negative bias against Microsoft, as he describes their AI conference as "underwhelming" and "lacking anything new."
- The article does not provide any balanced or objective perspective on the relationship between Microsoft and OpenAI. It only focuses on the downside of relying on an external partner for AI innovation, but it ignores the potential benefits and synergies that could arise from this collaboration. For example, Microsoft has access to OpenAI's cutting-edge research and technology, which could give them a competitive edge in the market.
- The article also fails to acknowledge the role of other factors that could influence Microsoft's AI future, such as their own internal R&D efforts, their acquisitions and partnerships with other AI companies, and their strategic vision for the future of computing. It seems to assume that OpenAI is the only source of innovation and leadership in the field of AI, which is not necessarily true.