So, the article talks about some companies and how their shares are being traded in the market. Shares are like small pieces of a company that people can buy or sell. Some companies did well and their shares went up, but some companies didn't do so well and their shares went down. Herbalife is one such company where its shares went down by 36%. The article also talks about other companies whose shares are moving in the market on a Thursday afternoon. Read from source...

- The title of the article is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Herbalife shares are trading lower by around 36% because of a specific reason or event, when in reality, it is just one of many factors affecting the stock market on Thursday's mid-day session. A more accurate title would be "Herbalife Shares Among Other Stocks Trading Lower On Thursday".
- The article lacks depth and context for some of the mentioned companies and their financial results. For example, it only states that West Pharmaceutical Services reported mixed fourth-quarter financial results, but does not provide any details or analysis on what was good or bad about those results, or how they compare to analysts' expectations or previous performance.
- The article uses vague and subjective terms like "fell" and "dipped" without specifying by how much or why. This makes it hard for readers to understand the magnitude of the changes and the possible causes behind them. A more objective and informative way would be to use numbers, percentages, and keywords like "due to", "because of", or "as a result of".
- The article does not provide any sources or references for its claims or data. This makes it hard for readers to verify the accuracy and credibility of the information presented. A good practice would be to cite reputable sources such as financial reports, press releases, or news articles that support the main points of the article.
- The article does not have a clear structure or organization. It jumps from one company to another without providing any transition or connection between them. It also does not have a conclusion or summary section that wraps up the main ideas and findings of the article. A better structure would be to start with an introduction that states the purpose and scope of the article, then provide a body that covers each company in detail, followed by a conclusion that summarizes the main points and implications of the article.