Someone hacked the official account of a big government agency on Twitter, and they sent messages about bitcoin that made its price go up and down a lot. This happened because the account did not have extra security to protect it. The people who run Twitter said this could have been prevented if they had two-factor authentication, which is like having two keys to open a door instead of one. Read from source...

1. The headline is misleading and sensationalized. It suggests that Elon Musk's X directly caused the SEC Twitter hack, which is not true. The compromise of the @SECGov account was a result of unauthorized access to a phone number linked to it, not due to any breach in X's systems.
2. The article repeats the same information multiple times, such as mentioning the SEC's lack of two-factor authentication and Musk's decision to make 2FA a paid service for Twitter Blue subscribers. This shows a lack of editorial effort and originality in reporting.
3. The article quotes Gary Gensler's tweet about bitcoin ETFs, which seems unrelated to the main topic of the SEC Twitter hack. It appears as if the author is trying to link two different events that have no direct connection.
4. The article does not provide any background or context on the SEC Twitter hack, such as when it happened, how it was discovered, and what consequences it had for the agency. This leaves the reader unaware of the severity and implications of the incident.
5. The article focuses too much on the market reaction to the hack, especially the bitcoin price fluctuations. While this information might be interesting to some readers, it is not directly relevant to the main issue of the security breach at the SEC.