A group of very rich people who know a lot about money are betting that the price of something called On Holding will go down. They use special things called options to make this prediction, which let them buy or sell On Holding at certain prices. The article tells us that most of these rich people think the price will be between $35 and $40. If they are right, they can make a lot of money from their bets. Read from source...

- The title of the article is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that smart money, or large institutional investors, are betting big on ONON options, but it does not provide any evidence or data to support this claim. A more accurate title would be something like "Some Investors Show Bearish Sentiment On ONON Options".
- The article relies heavily on volume and open interest data, which can be influenced by various factors such as market makers, hedging strategies, and speculative activity. Volume and open interest are not necessarily indicative of smart money flow or conviction in a particular direction. A more thorough analysis would include other factors such as options delta, gamma, vega, and theta, which measure the sensitivity of an option's price to changes in underlying assets, volatility, and time decay respectively.
- The article uses subjective terms like "whales" and "smart money", but does not define them or provide any criteria for determining who falls into these categories. These terms are vague and can be interpreted differently by different readers, which creates confusion and ambiguity. A more objective and transparent approach would be to identify the specific investors, funds, or strategies that are involved in the options trades, and explain how they qualify as smart money or whales.
- The article makes assumptions about the expected price movements of ONON based on the volume and open interest data, but does not provide any historical context or comparison to other similar stocks or sectors. This makes it difficult for readers to evaluate the validity and reliability of these predictions. A more rigorous analysis would include technical analysis, fundamental analysis, and comparative analysis to support the price targets and expected price windows.
- The article promotes Benzinga Pro as a source of real-time options trades alerts, but does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest or affiliations with this service. This creates a conflict of interest and undermines the credibility and objectivity of the article. A more ethical approach would be to clearly state any relationships or partnerships with Benzinga Pro or other related services, and provide an unbiased comparison of different options trading platforms and tools available in the market.