A big boss of a game company, Tim Sweeney, is very unhappy with Apple because they made a new rule that makes it hard for him to sell his games at a good price. He thinks this rule is not fair and wants to go to court to change it. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney is taking Apple to court over a bad faith compliance plan after the Supreme Court ruling, when in reality, he is contesting Apple's new 30% tax on web purchases for developers, which was introduced as a result of the ruling.
- The article uses vague and unclear language throughout, such as "bad faith compliance plan", "anticompetitive new 27% tax" (which should be 30%, not 27%) and "kills price competition". These terms are either inaccurate or exaggerated, and do not provide a fair and balanced representation of the situation.
- The article fails to mention that Epic Games violated Apple's terms of service by implementing its own in-app payment system without prior approval, which led to the removal of Fortnite from the App Store. This is an important context that contradicts the portrayal of Epic Games as a victim of Apple's unfair practices.
- The article does not explore the potential reasons and benefits behind Apple's 30% tax, such as maintaining quality control, security, user privacy, and supporting its ecosystem. It also does not acknowledge that some developers may prefer this model over alternative payment methods.
- The article quotes Tim Sweeney's tweet without providing any analysis or commentary on it, which makes it seem like a neutral and factual source, when in reality, it is a subjective and one-sided opinion that reflects Epic Games' interests and agenda.
- The article ends with an irrelevant disclaimer that mentions Benzinga Neuro and its involvement in producing the content, which may raise questions about the credibility and independence of the journalism.