So, this article talks about some people on a TV show called CNBC who are giving their opinions on which stocks to buy or sell. They mentioned four companies: Amazon, Alphabet, Garmin and a real estate company called AvalonBay Communities. Some of them said good things about these companies and some of them suggested buying their stocks. Read from source...

- The title of the article is misleading and sensationalist. It does not mention any specific stock or sector that is being discussed on CNBC's "Final Trades". Instead, it lists four different companies from various industries without providing any context or connection between them. A better title would be something like "CNBC's 'Final Trades': Analysts Share Their Top Picks In Different Sectors"
- The article is poorly structured and lacks coherence. It jumps from one analyst to another without explaining who they are, what their credentials are, or why they matter. It also does not provide any background information on the companies mentioned or the reasons behind their recommendations. A more informative article would be organized by sector, introduce each company and its main features, and then present the analysts' opinions and rationales
- The article uses vague and subjective terms to describe the analysts' views. For example, it says that Jason Snipe "says Alphabet reported a 46% increase in operating income". This is not an opinion or a recommendation, but a factual statement that can be easily verified by checking Alphabet's earnings report. The article should either explain how this information affects the stock's valuation or performance, or quote the analyst directly with more detail and analysis
- The article does not provide any evidence or sources to support its claims. For instance, it says that Stephanie Link "names AvalonBay Communities as her final trade". Without knowing why she chose this company, what her expectations are, or how she compares it to other similar options, the reader cannot judge the validity or relevance of her pick. The article should cite some data, research, or expert opinions that justify her choice and demonstrate its potential upside
- The article has a negative tone and uses emotional language to persuade the reader. For example, it says that "Alphabet reported a 46% increase in operating income" as if this were a bad thing. It also implies that CNBC's "Final Trades" are not worth paying attention to by using quotation marks around the phrase. The article should be more neutral and objective, and avoid making assumptions or generalizations about the market or the analysts

Neutral
Explanation: The article is reporting on the final trades of various financial experts and does not express a clear sentiment towards any stock mentioned. It is merely providing information about their recommendations.