A big boss named Mr. Steinberg thinks that soon, computers that can think (called AI) will do many jobs that people called analysts do today. Some people are scared this will make many people lose their jobs, but others think it might create new jobs and help people earn more money. This is a big topic now because a group called IMF says that these thinking computers could affect how 40% of people work around the world. But another important person named Mr. Nadella thinks AI can actually be helpful for many people's jobs. Read from source...

1. The article starts by mentioning the Zeta Global CEO's opinion on Wall Street jobs being replaced by AI, but then it switches to a general discussion about AI impact on the job market without giving any specific details or evidence to support this claim. This is a logical fallacy known as "hasty generalization", where a conclusion is drawn based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence.
2. The article quotes Jim Cramer's opinion, who is not an expert in AI or Wall Street, and does not provide any context or reason for why his view matters. This is an appeal to authority fallacy, where a statement is accepted as true because of the position or reputation of the person who made it, rather than based on evidence or logical reasoning.
3. The article mentions the IMF's warning about AI influencing nearly 40% of jobs worldwide, but does not cite any sources or references for this claim. This is a appeal to fear fallacy, where a statement is made to create fear or panic without providing any factual basis or logical support.
4. The article contrasts the Zeta Global CEO's pessimistic view with Microsoft's optimistic view about AI creating jobs and increasing wages, but does not explain how or why these two views are reconciled or compatible. This is a straw man fallacy, where a person's argument is distorted or misrepresented to make it easier to attack or refute, instead of addressing the actual argument itself.