Sure, let's imagine you're playing a big game of pretend where you're investing in companies. Here are four cool companies some smart people on TV liked:

1. **Citigroup (C)** - This is like the grown-up version of when your mom or dad buys stuff with their debit card at the store. Citigroup helps other companies do that all over the world. A fancy bank from China and them joined hands to make it easier for people traveling in China to pay for things.

2. **Deckers Outdoor (DECK)** - Remember how you love your comfy sneakers? This company makes those! They're doing really well right now, so some people think it's a good idea to invest in them.

3. **Electronic Arts (EA)** - You know when you play video games and have a blast? This company makes some of those games that lots of kids love. They had a great second half of the year, but their stocks didn't go up as much as some people thought they would.

4. **iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA)** - Imagine you're on a big global adventure, and you want to invest in companies all over Asia. This is like a magic box that holds shares from lots of Indian companies. It's doing pretty well right now.

Each of these companies had something good happen or investors think they'll do well in the future. That's why some people picked them as their favorite stocks on TV. Read from source...

Based on the provided text from CNBC's "Halftime Report Final Trades," here are some potential criticisms and points of contention:

1. **Bias**: Some might argue there's a bias in the selection of stocks as three out of four picks (Citigroup, Deckers Outdoor, and Electronic Arts) are currently at or near 52-week highs, which may suggest a herd-like behavior among analysts.

2. **Lack of diversification**: The picks predominantly focus on finance (Citigroup), retail (Deckers Outdoor), and technology (Electronic Arts). There's no representation from other sectors like healthcare, energy, or consumer staples, which some investors might find lacking in diversification.

3. **Emotional behavior**: Mentions of stocks "surge" (Citigroup) and being a "strongest name" (Deckers Outdoor) could be seen as emotionally charged language rather than objective analysis.

4. **Irrational arguments**: The article doesn't delve into the fundamentals or growth prospects of the companies, using instead brief mentions of recent positive developments like collaborations or analyst initiations, which might not provide a robust basis for making investment decisions.

5. **Inconsistencies**: The article presents picks from different analysts with no unified investment thesis or strategy. This lack of consistency could make it challenging for readers to identify an overarching reason to consider these stocks.

6. **Lack of contrarian views**: All the picked stocks are currently doing well in the market. There's no mention of any undervalued or beaten-down companies that could present better buying opportunities.

7. **No mention of risks**: The article doesn't discuss potential risks associated with each stock, which is essential for a balanced investment approach.

8. **Timing**: With all stocks chosen near their recent highs, the timing of investing based on these picks might be seen as precarious if one believes in strategies like "buy low, sell high."

Based on the content provided, here's a sentiment analysis of the article:

**Positive**:
- "Citigroup Inc. C surged to a fresh 52-week high"
- "Deckers Outdoor shares gained 5.6%"
- "Electronic Arts shares fell by 0.8%" (though this could be considered neutral as it's not a significant drop)
- "iShares MSCI India ETF gained by 2%"

**Bullish (explicit or implicit recommendations)**:
- Jim Lebenthal named Citigroup Inc. C
- Rob Sechan of NewEdge Wealth named Deckers Outdoor DECK
- Kevin Simpson of Capital Wealth Planning picked Electronic Arts EA
- Stephanie Link of Hightower Advisors picked iShares MSCI India ETF INDA

**Neutral**:
- The article merely reports price movements and analyst picks, without any significant negative news or sentiments.

The overall sentiment of the article is **bullish**, as it mainly focuses on recent gains of specific stocks and analysts' positive recommendations.

Based on the CNBC "Halftime Report Final Trades," here are the stocks and ETF picked by the experts, along with brief analyses of their recent performances and potential risks:

1. **Citigroup Inc. (C)**
- *Recommendation*: Buy
- *Reason*: Jim Lebenthal of Cerity Partners highlighted Citigroup's new collaboration with Bank of Shanghai to launch a global payment solution for international travelers in China.
- *Recent Performance*: C stock surged to a fresh 52-week high on Friday, closing at $69.84 after a 1.3% gain.
- *Risks*: Macroeconomic risks and geopolitical tensions could impact the financial sector and Citigroup's international operations.

2. **Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK)**
- *Recommendation*: Buy
- *Reason*: Rob Sechan of NewEdge Wealth praised Deckers Outdoor as one of the strongest names in the retail space.
- *Recent Performance*: DECK shares gained 5.6% on Friday, closing at $192.15.
- *Risks*: Competition in the athletic footwear market and consumer spending trends could influence Deckers' performance.

3. **Electronic Arts Inc. (EA)**
- *Recommendation*: Buy
- *Reason*: Kevin Simpson of Capital Wealth Planning picked Electronic Arts due to its strong revenue growth.
- *Recent Performance*: EA shares fell by 0.8% on Friday, closing at $166.67, following a mixed earnings report in late October.
- *Risks*: Market dynamics for video games and competition from other gaming companies could impact Electronic Arts' performance.

4. **iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA)**
- *Recommendation*: Buy
- *Reason*: Stephanie Link of Hightower Advisors picked INDA as her favorite place to invest outside the US.
- *Recent Performance*: iShares MSCI India ETF gained 2% during Friday's session, trading at around $48.70 per share.
- *Risks*: Geopolitical and economic risks in India, along with broader emerging market risk, could impact INDA.

Before making any investment decisions, consider your risk tolerance, investment objectives, and conduct thorough research or consult with a financial advisor. The analysis provided here is based on brief explanations and should not be considered as investment advice.