A company called Fluent is doing really well and its price is going up fast, but it's still not very expensive compared to other similar companies. This means it's a good time to buy its shares because you can make more money in less time by selling them later at a higher price. Read from source...

- The article starts by stating the obvious, that everyone likes betting on fast-moving trending stocks, but fails to provide any evidence or data to support this claim. This is a common fallacy of appealing to popularity or common sense, which does not make for a strong argument.
- The article then introduces the concept of momentum investing, without defining what it means or how it works. It simply assumes that the reader knows what momentum is and how to measure it, which may not be the case for many novice investors. This is a fallacy of begging the question, or circular reasoning, which assumes the truth of what needs to be proven.
- The article then presents a hypothetical scenario of betting on stocks that lose momentum and fail to justify their valuation, without providing any actual examples or statistics. This is another example of a fallacy of false dilemma, or black or white thinking, which oversimplifies the situation and ignores other possible outcomes or factors.
- The article then introduces the Zacks Momentum Style Score, which pays close attention to trends in a stock's price or earnings, without explaining how it is calculated, what criteria are used, or how reliable or valid it is. This is another example of a fallacy of appeal to authority, which cites an unverified or questionable source as proof of something.
- The article then claims that the 'Fast-Paced Momentum at a Bargain' screen comes handy in spotting fast-moving stocks that are still attractively priced, without showing any data or evidence to support this claim. This is another example of a fallacy of hasty generalization, which draws conclusions based on insufficient or unrepresentative samples.
- The article then mentions Fluent as one of the stocks that pass through the screen, and briefly describes its business model, without providing any analysis or evaluation of its performance, prospects, risks, or valuation. This is another example of a fallacy of irrelevant conclusion, which draws conclusions based on factors that are not relevant or related to the question or problem at hand.
- The article then ends by stating the key reasons why Fluent shows fast-paced momentum but is still a bargain stock, without giving any specific details, numbers, or sources. This is another example of a fallacy of appealing to ignorance, which asserts that a claim is true because it has not been proven false, rather than being supported by evidence.

Overall, the article appears to be biased and irrational in its argument, relying on fallacies and emotional language to persuade the reader to invest in Fluent or other similar stock

First, I will summarize the main points from the article and then provide my own analysis and opinion on Fluent as an investment opportunity. Please let me know if you have any questions or feedback along the way.