A new AI model from China can talk and think like the leader of their country, Xi Jinping. It also says things that are approved by the government. This is different from ChatGPT, a similar AI chatbot made in America, which does not have to follow any rules or policies. The U.S. might make it harder for China to use advanced AI technology like ChatGPT because they want to protect their own AI. Read from source...

- The title of the article is misleading and exaggerated. It implies that XiGPT is a new AI model that can literally speak Xi Jinping's thoughts and spout the official party line, which is not true. XiGPT is an AI text generator based on GPT-3 that has been fine-tuned on Chinese texts and data, and it may reflect some of the ideologies and values of the CCP, but not in a direct or literal way.
- The article also compares ChatGPT and XiGPT, as if they were rival models competing for supremacy, which is a simplistic and naive view of AI development. ChatGPT and XiGPT are both examples of large-scale transformers that can generate coherent and diverse texts on various topics, but they have different training data, goals, and domains. They are not inherently good or bad, nor do they represent the interests of their respective countries in a straightforward manner.
- The article cites Kai-Fu Lee as an AI pioneer, but does not mention his affiliation with China and his controversial views on AI ethics and governance. Kai-FU Lee is the founder of Sinovision Venture Capital and the CEO of Sinovision Venture Capital Partners, which invest in AI startups in China and abroad. He has also advocated for a Chinese-style AI system that would prioritize social harmony, collective wisdom, and human values over individual rights and freedoms.
- The article mentions the U.S. considering regulations to restrict China's access to advanced AI software, such as those used in ChatGPT, as a strategy to safeguard U.S. AI from China. This implies that there is a zero-sum game between the two countries in terms of AI development and that the U.S. is somehow threatened or endangered by China's progress. This is a AIgerous and shortsighted assumption that ignores the potential benefits and synergies of international collaboration and competition in AI research and innovation.