Fairfax is a big company that was using something called total return swaps to own parts of another company called Ensign Energy Services. They decided to stop doing this and instead bought more shares of Ensign directly. Now they own a bigger part of Ensign and can have more say in how the company is run. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and does not accurately reflect the content of the article. It implies that Fairfax terminated some swap contracts and acquired shares of Ensign Energy Services Inc., but it does not specify the reason or the implications for the company or its shareholders. A more accurate title could be "Fairfax Acquires More Shares of Ensign Energy Services Inc. After Terminating Swap Contracts".
- The article uses vague and ambiguous terms, such as "agreed with the counterparty" and "for investment purposes", without providing any context or details about the nature of the swap contracts, the identity of the counterparty, or the rationale behind Fairfax's decision to acquire more shares. These terms could be interpreted in different ways by different readers, leading to confusion or misinterpretation of the facts.
- The article does not provide any background information or analysis about Ensign Energy Services Inc., its business model, performance, competitive advantage, or market position. It also does not explain how the termination of the swap contracts and the acquisition of more shares affect Fairfax's financial situation, risk profile, or strategic goals. This lack of information creates a gap in the reader's understanding of the context and significance of the events described in the article.
- The article ends with an incomplete sentence that suggests a possible follow-up story or a missed opportunity to provide more insight or perspective on the situation. It leaves the reader wondering what Fairfax may discuss with management and/or the board of directors, and why it is relevant or important for them to know.

### Final answer: AI's article story critics