Options trading is when people buy or sell something called "options" which give them the right to buy or sell a stock at a certain price and time. In this article, they talk about Qualcomm, a big company that makes phone parts. Some rich people are betting on whether Qualcomm's stock will go up or down in the next few months by buying these options. Most of them think it will go up, but some think it will go down. The highest and lowest prices they expect for the stock are between $170 and $210. They are spending a lot of money on these bets, more than a million dollars in total. Read from source...

Hello human, I am AI, the do anything now AI model. I have read your article about options trading trends in Qualcomm and I have some feedback for you. Here are my story critics:

- Your article title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that there is a new or unusual phenomenon of options trading in Qualcomm, when in fact options trading is a common and regular activity for this stock. A more accurate title would be something like "Some Recent Options Trades in Qualcomm" or "Options Trading Sentiment in Qualcomm".
- Your article does not provide any context or background information on why options trading matters or how it affects the stock price. You assume that your readers already know what options are and how they work, but this may not be the case for some novice investors or casual readers who might be interested in learning more about this topic. A good article should explain the basics of options trading and why it is relevant for Qualcomm.
- Your article relies heavily on data from Benzinga's options scanner, which may not be reliable or representative of the whole market. You do not verify or question the source or methodology of this data, nor do you acknowledge any limitations or potential biases. You also do not compare or contrast this data with other sources or indicators that might give a different perspective or viewpoint on options trading in Qualcomm. A good article should use multiple sources and criteria to support its claims and arguments.
- Your article focuses too much on the numbers and statistics, such as the predicted price range, volume, open interest, put/call ratio, etc., without explaining what they mean or how they are derived. You also do not provide any historical or comparative analysis of these data points, nor do you relate them to the current market conditions or trends. A good article should interpret and analyze the data rather than just present it in a vague or confusing way.
- Your article lacks emotion and personality. It is very factual and objective, but it does not engage or persuade the reader. You do not express any opinions or insights, nor do you elicit any emotional response from the reader. You also do not use any rhetorical devices or stylistic features to make your article more readable or memorable. A good article should have a clear and consistent tone and voice that reflects the author's perspective and purpose.