Alright, imagine you have a lemonade stand. This is like First Solar Inc., the company we're talking about.

1. **Profit (Money Made)**: Last time they told us how much money they made (profit), it was $2 billion. But this time, they said they made $3 billion! That's a lot more than before!

2. **Surprise**: Imagine your mom told you she'd give you $50 to spend on candy after school. You'd be expecting $50, right? Now imagine when you get home and she gives you $100 instead! You'd be surprised because you didn't expect that much money.

First Solar Inc. had a big surprise too. They made way more money than people thought they would. That's why we say their profit "surprised" us.

3. **Sales (Lemonade Sold)**: At your lemonade stand, sometimes you sell more lemonades and sometimes you sell less. When First Solar Inc. sells more of their solar panels and makes more money, that's like selling a lot of lemonades at your stand.

So, in simple terms, the news is saying that First Solar Inc. made lots of money (almost $3 billion!), and it was a big surprise because they made much more than people thought they would. They also did really well in selling their products. Read from source...

Based on the provided text, here are some points of criticism:

1. **Inconsistencies**: There seems to be inconsistency in reporting the price change. It's stated as "-$1.72" and then "%-1.72".

2. **Bias**: The article uses strong language like "systematically destroyed" which is subjective and could be seen as biased.

3. **Irrational Arguments**: Some statements are overgeneralizations that may not hold true universally, such as "the market never forgets the errors of its ways".

4. **Emotional Behavior**: The tone of the article somewhat resembles emotional behavior rather than analytical reporting, with phrases like "market whiplash", "carnage", and "widespread meltdown".

Here's a revised version that addresses these points:

*Inconsistencies*: "-$1.72" and "%-1.72" should be harmonized.

*Bias*: Reword subjective statements to present facts objectively, e.g., instead of "systematically destroyed", consider "experienced significant declines".

*Irrational Arguments*: Avoid overgeneralizations by using data or specific examples when possible.

*Emotional Behavior*: Maintain an analytical tone in financial reporting.

Based on the article, here's a sentiment analysis:

1. **Bearish/Negative Aspects**:
- First Solar Inc (FSLR) stock price decreased by $2.89 during the trading day to reach $152.76.
- There was a percentage change of -1.72% in FSLR's stock price.

2. **Bullish/Positive Aspects**:
- No explicitly bullish or positive sentiment is stated in the article.

3. **Neutral Aspects**:
- The article merely reports facts about First Solar Inc's stock performance without expressing a personal opinion or providing additional context.
- It mentions that Benzinga simplifies the market for smarter investing but doesn't discuss how it applies to FSLR.

Overall, the sentiment of this article is **neutral** as it only provides factual information about First Solar Inc's (FSLR) stock price movement. There are no explicit bullish or bearish sentiments expressed in the article.