ExxonMobil is a big company that finds and sells oil. They were working in Iraq, but now they have left and given their work to another big company called PetroChina. This means that PetroChina is now the main company in charge of this huge place where they find lots of oil. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalized. It suggests that ExxonMobil has completely left Iraq and handed over all its operations to PetroChina, which is not true. ExxonMobil only exited the West Qurna 1 oilfield, one of several projects it had in Iraq, and still maintains a presence in other fields such as West Qurna 2 and Zubair.
- The article does not provide any context or background information on why ExxonMobil decided to exit West Qurna 1 and transfer its operations to PetroChina. It could be due to various factors such as financial, strategic, operational, or geopolitical reasons that are not explained in the article.
- The article does not mention any sources or references for its claims or statements, making it unclear how reliable or credible the information is. For example, it cites "Senior Iraqi oil officials" without naming them or providing any evidence of their involvement in the deal. It also uses Reuters as a source, but does not link to the original article or report that supports its claims.
- The article focuses too much on the numbers and statistics, such as the production capacity, reserves, stakes, and share prices of the West Qurna 1 oilfield, without providing any analysis or interpretation of what they mean for the parties involved or the market. It also does not compare or contrast these figures with other similar projects or fields in Iraq or elsewhere.
- The article uses emotional language and tone, such as "farewell" and "congratulate", to describe the deal closure between ExxonMobil and PetroChina, which implies a sense of finality and approval that may not be warranted or appropriate given the complexities and uncertainties of the situation. It also uses quotation marks incorrectly, placing them around "bid farewell" instead of "farewell".
- The article ends with a promotional note for Benzinga's services, which is irrelevant to the topic of the article and may be seen as an attempt to manipulate or influence the readers into signing up for their newsletter, ETF recommendations, price action alerts, or other offerings. This also creates a conflict of interest for Benzinga, as they are both providing news and selling financial products related to the same market.