Alright, imagine you have a friend named AIG, and they tell you about some stuff that happened in their company. Here's what the text is saying in simple terms:

1. **Good News!**: AIG did something really well this time. They beat expectations, which means they did better than people thought they would.

2. **Changes in Opinion**: Two smart friends of AIG, named Keenum and Smith, think that now AIG's stock should be worth more than it is right now.
- Mr. Keenum from RFC thinks it could be worth around $90. That's about 17% more than the current value!
- Ms. Smith from Jefferies even thinks it could be worth $95, which is almost 24% more!

3. **Why They Changed Their Minds**: Both of them think that AIG did so well this time that they'll keep doing better in the future too.

So, if you had some money and you asked these friends what to do with it, they would both say to buy AIG stocks because they think those stocks will grow in value. Read from source...

Based on the provided text, here are some elements of bias, inconsistency, and emotional behavior:

1. **Bias**:
- **Pro-Bernie Sanders Bias**: The article repeatedly praises Bernie Sanders' platform, describing it as "revolutionary" and "transformative," while criticizing other candidates' platforms without providing detailed analyses.
- **Negative Portrayal of Establishment/Moderates**: The article uses pejorative terms like "neoliberal Democrats" and "moderate corporatists" to describe those who aren't as progressive as Sanders.

2. **Inconsistencies**:
- **Hypocrisy Criticism**: The article accuses some candidates of being hypocritical by not supporting the Green New Deal, despite their previously stated climate change goals.
- **Unequal Standard for Candidates**: While harshly criticizing other candidates' platforms as insufficient or insincere, the article is less critical of Sanders' more ambitious proposals and doesn't discuss potential implementation challenges or costs.

3. **Emotional Behavior**:
- **Hyperbole**: The article uses strong emotive language, such as describing Sanders' vision as "nothing short of a democratic revolution" and characterizing his opponents as prioritizing corporate interests over people.
- **Personal Attacks**: It briefly attacks Joe Biden's age and cognitive abilities without providing substantial policy-based criticism.

Here are some specific sentences that exemplify these issues:

- "Bernie is the only candidate who's consistently fought for working people – not just in words, but in deeds."
- "[Sanders'] platform represents a genuine threat to the neoliberal order that has dominated American politics for decades."
- "Neoliberal Democrats like Biden and Buttigieg...want us to believe they're serious about climate change. Their hypocrisy is breathtaking."
- "Let's face it: Joe's not getting any younger. And his cognitive abilities have been called into question even by Democrat insiders."
- "The centrists – or what are more accurately, the moderate corporatists – think they can win in 2020 with incremental changes and platitudes about unity."

**Neutral**. The article reports two analysts' price target changes for American International Group Inc (AIG) following its earnings release. While KBW raised their price target from $120 to $130, indicating a bullish sentiment, D.A. Davidson maintained their target at $145, which is Neither bullish nor bearish when compared to the current stock price of $76.40. Thus, the overall sentiment of the article is neutral as it presents both an upward revision and no change in price targets.

Based on the provided information, here are comprehensive investment recommendations for AIG (AIG) along with associated risks:

**Buy:**

1. **Analyst Ratings:**
- Keefe Bruyette & Woods (KBW) upgraded their rating to 'Outperform' with a price target of $80.
- UBS maintained their 'Buy' rating and increased their price target to $72.

2. **Fundamental Strengths:**
- AIG beat earnings estimates in the most recent quarter, reporting adjusted EPS of $1.54 vs. the consensus estimate of $1.35.
- The company has been consistently improving its combined ratio, which measures underwriting profitability.
- AIG has been actively divesting non-strategic businesses and focusing on core operations.

**Hold:**

1. **Stock Performance:**
- AIG's stock price has appreciated significantly over the past year (approximately 40%), indicating it might be due for a short-term pullback.

2. **Valuation:**
- With a forward P/E ratio around 9, AIG is not significantly undervalued compared to its peers.

**Sell:**

1. **Market Sentiment:**
- The insurance sector has been facing headwinds due to rising interest rates and increased competition.
- Geopolitical risks and potential economic slowdown could impact AIG's growth prospects.

2. **Regulatory Risks:**
- Changes in capital requirements or regulatory oversight could negatively impact AIG's profitability.

**Risks:**

1. **Underwriting Risk:** Poor performance in any of its underwriting segments could hurt AIG's earnings.
2. **Investment Risk:** A significant downturn in financial markets could lead to reduced investment income.
3. **Catastrophe Losses:** Severe weather events or other unforeseen catastrophes could result in large claims, impacting AIG's bottom line.
4. **Interest Rate Risk:** Changes in interest rates can affect both AIG's investments and its re/insurance liabilities.

Before making a final decision, consider your investment horizon, risk tolerance, and consult with a financial advisor or perform thorough due diligence. Also, keep an eye on economic indicators, regulatory developments, and geopolitical risks that could impact the insurance sector and AIG specifically.