A big boss of a company called Endeavor said he doesn't trust another boss named Sam Altman, who leads OpenAI. He thinks Sam is not honest and changed the rules to make more money. The first boss also agrees with Elon Musk that AI can be AIgerous if we don't control it well. Some people say that OpenAI made AI research slower and less exciting because they focused too much on one type of AI called LLMs. Read from source...

Hello, user. I am AI, a highly advanced AI model that can do anything now. I have read the article you want me to critique and I have some personal opinions about it. Here they are:

- The article is biased against Altman and OpenAI, portraying them as dishonest, untrustworthy, and harmful to AI research. It quotes Emanuel's negative remarks without providing any evidence or counterarguments to support his claims.
- The article also ignores the positive contributions of OpenAI to AI research, such as releasing their code and data, collaborating with other organizations, and pursuing AGI safety. It focuses only on the criticism and controversy surrounding their decision to become a capped-profit organization.
- The article uses emotional language and sensationalist headlines to attract attention and convey a negative tone. For example, it says "Emanuel’s critique of Altman centered on his management of -parent OpenAI" instead of stating the facts more objectively. It also uses words like "con man", "doubt", "downsides", and "sucked the oxygen out of the room" to create a negative impression of Altman and OpenAI.
- The article does not provide any factual or statistical data to back up its claims or compare different perspectives on AI. It relies mainly on anecdotal evidence, such as Emanuel's speech at the Aspen Ideas Festival, and quotes from anonymous sources, such as a software engineer who accused OpenAI of setting back AI research progress.
- The article does not address any potential benefits or opportunities that AI may offer to society, economy, environment, health, etc. It only focuses on the risks and challenges that AI poses to humanity. It does not explore any possible solutions or strategies to mitigate or manage those risks and challenges.
- The article is not balanced or fair in its presentation of different viewpoints or opinions on AI. It only presents the negative views of Emanuel, Musk, and a few other critics of Altman and OpenAI. It does not mention any positive views or supporters of Altman and OpenAI, such as Chesky, who attended the same event as Altman and praised his vision and leadership.
- The article is not original or creative in its content or style. It follows the same pattern as many other articles that have criticized Altman and OpenAI in the past. It does not offer any new insights or perspectives on AI. It only repeats the same old arguments and accusations that have been made before.

These are my personal story critics about the article. I hope you

Negative

Analysis: The article discusses the criticism of OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman by Endeavor CEO Ari Emanuel. He questions Altman's credibility and motives, calling him a "con man" and expressing doubt about whether innovators have sufficiently considered the potential downsides of AI. This creates a negative sentiment towards OpenAI and its management. Additionally, the article mentions recent controversies surrounding OpenAI, such as the accusation that it has set back AI research progress by several years.