Hey there! I'm going to explain to you what happened in Germany with cannabis, which is a plant that some people use to feel relaxed or have fun. The German government decided that it's not illegal anymore for people to use it at home, but they still need to grow it themselves and not buy it from stores. Some people who work for the cannabis industry and others who want to change the rules are happy about this decision, because they think it's a good step forward. But they also know that there is more work to do, because the government hasn't said how people can get the plant legally or what kind of rules they have to follow when using it. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and clickbait-like, as it implies that legalization has already happened in Germany, while the article states that only decriminalization for personal consumption has occurred, and retail sales are still being planned by the government. A more accurate title could be "EXCLUSIVE: German Cannabis Decriminalization, Activists Celebrate Now But The Struggle Continues".
2. The article uses emotional language and exaggeration to describe the scene of thousands gathered at the Brandenburger Door in Berlin, such as "mythic" and "kind of burning down the whole internet". This detracts from the objectivity and credibility of the journalism.
3. The quotes from Georg Wurth and Fabian Steinmetz are not directly related to the main topic of the article, which is the legalization process in Germany. They focus more on their personal involvement and opinions as activists and experts, rather than providing insights into the current state and future prospects of cannabis reform in the country.
4. The article does not provide any evidence or sources to support the claims made by Wurth and Steinmetz, such as their estimates of the probability of legalization and the improvement of the situation. This makes their arguments less persuasive and trustworthy for readers who are interested in learning about the facts and figures behind cannabis reform in Germany.
5. The article ends abruptly with an incomplete sentence that suggests a lack of thoroughness and professionalism from the author. It does not address the main issue raised by Wurth, which is the insufficient possession limit for home growers and the need for further changes in the regulations to allow more freedom and access to cannabis for consumers.

Bullish

Summary:
The article discusses the recent decriminalization of cannabis in Germany and the celebrations that followed. It also highlights the challenges and struggles that still remain as the German government lacks concrete plans for retail sales. The two experts interviewed express cautious optimism about the future of cannabis reform in Europe, but acknowledge that further progress will require continued advocacy and protest.

Analysis:
The article has a generally positive tone, as it celebrates the achievements of the cannabis movement in Germany and recognizes it as a milestone in European cannabis reform. However, it also acknowledges the ongoing challenges and limitations that remain, such as the lack of concrete plans for retail sales and the low possession limit for homegrown cannabis. The experts interviewed express cautious optimism but also emphasize the need for continued activism to achieve further progress. This suggests a bullish sentiment towards the future of cannabis reform in Germany, but with a realistic awareness of the obstacles that remain.