A big company called Apple, which makes iPhones and other things, has a leader named Tim Cook. He went to China to meet some people who help them make their products. They work with a Chinese company called BYD that makes cars and other electronic stuff. Apple sells many phones in China, but they are not doing as well as before because other companies are making cheaper phones. So, Tim Cook wants to fix this problem by working more with the Chinese people who can help them make better products. Read from source...

1. The article title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Apple is in desperate need of a fix in China, when in reality, it is just trying to maintain its market share and partnerships amidst increasing competition from local rivals. A more accurate title could be "Apple Strengthens Ties With Key Partner In Shanghai As iPhone Sales Face Challenges".
2. The article relies too much on quotes from Cook and Wang, without providing enough context or analysis of their statements. For example, it does not explain how the partnership between Apple and BYD benefits both parties, nor how it relates to the broader market trends in China's new energy vehicle sector.
3. The article ignores some of the possible reasons behind Apple's declining sales in China, such as the impact of the US-China trade war, the rise of domestic brands like Vivo and Huawei, or the changing preferences of Chinese consumers towards cheaper and more feature-rich smartphones.
4. The article focuses too much on Apple's challenges in China, while downplaying its successes and achievements in other areas. For instance, it does not mention that Apple is still the second largest smartphone vendor in China, behind only Huawei, or that it has a loyal and growing customer base for its premium products like AirPods and iPads.
5. The article uses some emotive language and exaggerated claims, such as calling BYD "the world's largest maker of new energy vehicles" without specifying the time frame or the criteria for measurement. It also suggests that Vivo surpassing Apple as China's top smartphone seller is a major setback for the latter, when in reality, it still holds a significant market share and profitability.
6. The article lacks some relevant and up-to-date information that could provide a more balanced and comprehensive view of the situation. For example, it does not mention how Apple's recent launches of new products or services, such as the iPhone 12, AirTags, or Apple TV+, have been received by Chinese consumers and media, or what are the implications of the ongoing negotiations between the US and China for the future of their trade relations.