A long time ago, a company named General Motors (GM) made a car that used electricity instead of gas. But they stopped making it because they thought it was very ugly and not many people liked it. Kimbal Musk, who is Elon Musk's brother, didn't like this decision either. He thinks it was bad for the environment and the cars were better than what we have today. Read from source...

1. Article title is misleading and sensationalist, implying that Kimbal Musk was unhappy with GM killing its electric car project because of personal reasons or family feud, rather than business or environmental ones. 2. The article uses vague terms like "ugly as sin" to describe the EV1, without providing any objective criteria or evidence for this claim, which seems to be based on subjective aesthetic preferences and emotional reactions. 3. The article does not mention that GM had other reasons for killing its electric car project, such as low sales, high costs, and legal issues, which suggest that it was a rational business decision rather than a malicious or ignorant one. 4. The article also does not acknowledge the role of Tesla Motors in developing and promoting electric vehicles, which is ironic given that Elon Musk is Kimbal's brother and Tesla is one of GM's main competitors in the EV market. 5. The article quotes Kimbal Musk as saying that he was not happy with GM killing its electric car project, but does not provide any details or examples of how he was affected by this decision, either personally or professionally, which makes his claim seem vague and unconvincing.

Step 1: Analyze the title of the article and the main topic discussed.
The title contains the words "Elon Musk", "Brother Kimbal", "GM" (General Motors), "Killing Its 'Ugly As Sin' Electric Car". These are the key elements that indicate the subject matter is about a conflict between Elon Musk and General Motors regarding an electric car project.
Step 2: Identify the tone of the article by examining its content.
The article quotes Kimbal Musk, who expresses his dissatisfaction with GM's decision to cancel their electric car project. He says it was "ugly as sin" and that he felt betrayed by them. This shows a negative sentiment towards General Motors and the situation.
Step 3: Assess the overall sentiment of the article based on the tone and content.
The article seems to be largely critical of General Motors' actions, especially from Kimbal Musk's perspective. It portrays him as a victim of GM's decision and highlights his anger and disappointment. The article does not present any positive aspects or counterarguments regarding GM's choice. Therefore, the overall sentiment of the article is negative towards General Motors.
### Final answer: Negative

- Invest in Tesla (TSLA) as it is the leading company in electric vehicles, has a strong brand, and is innovating constantly. The risk is that the competition from other automakers may increase over time, and the stock price may be volatile due to market fluctuations.
- Invest in Rivian (RIVN) as it is a new entrant in the electric vehicle market, but has received significant investment from Amazon and Ford. The risk is that the company may face challenges in scaling up production and meeting customer demand, and may lose money in the short term due to high R&D costs.
- Invest in ChargePoint (CHPT) as it is a leading provider of electric vehicle charging solutions, and has a large network of charging stations across North America and Europe. The risk is that the company may face regulatory hurdles in expanding its operations, and may also be affected by the competition from other charging networks and battery manufacturers.
- Avoid General Motors (GM) as it has killed its electric car project, the EV1, which was considered a pioneer in the industry. The company may face backlash from environmentalists and customers who value sustainability, and may also lose market share to other automakers who are investing more in electric vehicles.
- Avoid Toyota (TM) as it has been slow to adopt electric vehicle technology, and has focused mainly on hybrid cars. The company may face a decline in sales and profitability as the demand for electric vehicles increases, and may also be at a disadvantage compared to other automakers who have more experience in battery technology and manufacturing.