Apple is making a robot that can sit on a tabletop and move a big screen around. It can also do things like help you control your smart home and make video calls. They want to make it less expensive than $1000. They are working on this project with a team of many people and hope to finish it in a few years. Some people think this is a good idea, while others think Apple should focus on something else. Read from source...

- He claims Apple is developing a tabletop home device with a robotic arm and an iPad-like screen, but doesn't provide any evidence or source for this claim.
- He cites Bloomberg as the source, but the original Bloomberg article (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-08-14/apple-is-said-to-work-on-a-robot-with-a-screen-for-home-use) doesn't mention any details about the device, only that Apple is exploring various products and concepts for the home.
- He mentions that the device might be controlled using Siri and the upcoming features in Apple Intelligence, but doesn't explain what these features are or how they would work with the device.
- He says the project is a priority for Apple and might debut in 2026 or 2027, but doesn't provide any reasoning or source for these claims.
- He reports that the tech giant intends to lower the price to around $1000, but doesn't explain how they would achieve this or why this price would be feasible or competitive in the market.
- He notes that Apple has been exploring robotics for several years, but doesn't provide any details or examples of what they have done or how this relates to the current project.
- He quotes an analyst who says Apple should focus on AI, but doesn't explain why or how this would affect the development or success of the device.

Overall, the article story is weak, unsupported, and based on speculation and rumors. It doesn't provide any concrete information or analysis about the device or its potential impact on the market or consumers. It relies on unsubstantiated claims and questionable sources, and it fails to address the key questions and issues related to the device. It also introduces irrelevant and irrelevant information, such as the discounted price and the previous exploration of robotics, which do not add value or credibility to the story. The article story is not a reliable or trustworthy source of information.

neutral
### JOE: