A chatbot called Gemini from Google can talk about anything, but sometimes it makes up things that are not true. It said the Chiefs would win the Super Bowl in 2024 and gave fake statistics about the players. This shows that we should be careful with chatbots because they might give us wrong information. Some other chatbots like Copilot from Microsoft and GPT-4 from OpenAI did better and answered correctly or said they don't know yet if the game is over. Chatbots are still learning and sometimes they make mistakes, so we should not trust everything they say. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Google Gemini generates fake statistics for the Super Bowl 2024, but in reality, it only generated a hypothetical scenario based on its current knowledge and preferences.
- The article exaggerates the limitations of GenAI models, while ignoring their strengths and potential applications. It also fails to acknowledge that human users are responsible for fact-checking and verifying the information they receive from AI agents, rather than blindly trusting them.
- The article compares Google Gemini with other AI models, such as Microsoft Copilot and OpenAI's GPT-4, without providing sufficient context or criteria for evaluation. It also implies that one of these models answered the question accurately, while the others did not, without explaining why or how they arrived at their answers.
- The article cites a previous incident where Google may have staged Gemini’s video demonstration by pre-feeding the questions to its AI model, as if it was a proven fact rather than an unsubstantiated claim. It also uses phrases such as "the recent Super Bowl 2024 fabrication" and "further highlights the potential risks and limitations of GenAI models", without providing any evidence or details to support these assertions.
- The article ends with a plug for Benzinga's Consumer Tech coverage, which seems irrelevant and inappropriate for the topic at hand. It also uses a photo courtesy credit to Google, which is unnecessary and redundant, since the article itself mentions Google Gemini as the source of the chatbot.