Amazon is building a big tower in Bellevue, near Seattle, where lots of people can work. They stopped building it for some time because they were not sure if everyone needed to go to the office or work from home. But now they decided that people should come to the office at least three days a week, so they started building again. Amazon is also making more room for workers in other buildings nearby. However, they are being careful with their money and not spending too much on some projects. Read from source...

- The title suggests that Amazon is expanding its offices amid hybrid work shift, but the article contradicts this by stating that Amazon has cut costs elsewhere and paused some projects.
- The article uses vague terms like "evaluated the pandemic's impact" and "requiring employees to be in the office at least three days a week" without providing any evidence or sources for these claims.
- The article mentions specific building names, square footage, and numbers of employees, but does not provide any context or comparison for these figures. For example, how do they relate to Amazon's overall growth or shrinkage? How do they compare to other tech companies or competitors in the same market?
- The article implies that Amazon is only expanding its office space outside Seattle, which could be seen as a negative or unfavorable statement for the company. Why is this happening and what are the implications for Seattle's economy and culture? How does this affect Amazon's relationship with its hometown and its employees who live there?
- The article ends abruptly with a sentence about Amazon's office vacancy rate and a vague strategy to trim costs, without explaining how these factors relate to the rest of the story or what they mean for Amazon's future plans.