Someone with a lot of money is betting that a company called Johnson Controls Intl will lose value in the future. They are doing this by buying something called options, which give them the right to sell a certain number of shares at a specific price. If the company's shares do go down, they can make money by exercising their options and selling the shares at the higher price they paid for them. But if the company's shares go up, they lose money. This big bet is important because it could mean they have some insider information or they just think they know better than most people about the company's future. Read from source...

- He criticizes the Benzinga article for not providing any explanation or context for the options activity, and for focusing too much on the recent options history, without considering the broader market trends and the company's fundamentals.
- He points out that the Benzinga article uses the terms "bearish" and "bullish" without defining them, which could confuse readers who are not familiar with options trading terminology.
- He questions the validity and reliability of the Benzinga options scanner, which claims to have spotted 10 options trades for Johnson Controls Intl, but does not provide any evidence or details of these trades, such as the date, time, size, type, or direction of the trades.
- He argues that the Benzinga article uses vague and misleading terms, such as "wealthy individual" and "somebody knows something is about to happen", which do not provide any concrete or actionable information for readers who want to trade options based on the article's findings.
- He challenges the Benzinga article's assumption that the options trades indicate a bearish sentiment, and suggests that there could be other reasons for the options activity, such as hedging, spreading, or neutral strategies, that do not necessarily imply a negative outlook on the stock.
- He criticizes the Benzinga article for relying on outdated and irrelevant data, such as the volume and open interest trends, which do not reflect the current market situation or the company's performance, and for not providing any analysis or interpretation of this data.
- He argues that the Benzinga article's expert opinions are not helpful or informative, as they are based on different models and assumptions, and do not agree on a clear and consistent price target or rating for the stock.
- He suggests that readers who want to trade options on Johnson Controls Intl should look for more reliable and credible sources of information, such as options databases, academic papers, or professional analysts, and not rely on the Benzinga article's claims and recommendations.