OpenAI is a company that works on making smart computers that can think and learn by themselves. They want to be very careful with their work because they don't want the computers to do bad things or cause problems for people. But some important people who were helping OpenAI with this safety issue left the company, so now OpenAI has to change how they work on keeping their smart computers safe and good. Read from source...

- The article starts with a sensationalized title that implies OpenAI is in crisis or undergoing drastic changes due to the departure of some key team members. However, it does not provide any evidence or context for such claims, and only mentions one specific change (the disbanding of the superalignment team) as the main reason for the strategy adjustment. This creates a false impression of urgency and instability in OpenAI's situation, which may not be justified by the facts.
- The article relies heavily on unnamed sources and vague terms such as "influencing", "stirred debates", and "challenges" to support its claims. These sources are not verified or cited, and the terms are too ambiguous and subjective to convey any clear or objective information. This lowers the credibility and quality of the article, and suggests a lack of thorough research and analysis.
- The article does not explain what is superalignment, why it is important for AI safety, or how it differs from other approaches. It also does not provide any details on the work done by the superalignment team, or the reasons behind their departure. This leaves the reader unaware of the significance and implications of this change, and unable to evaluate OpenAI's strategy or performance.
- The article mentions that John Schulman will lead OpenAI's alignment work, but does not provide any background or qualifications for him, or his views on AI safety. It also does not mention how he plans to address the challenges and opportunities faced by OpenAI in this field. This creates a gap in the reader's understanding of the current situation and future direction of OpenAI.
- The article ends with an incomplete sentence that suggests the author ran out of time or interest to finish the story. This is unprofessional and disappointing, as it leaves the reader hanging and unsatisfied with the information provided. It also undermines the confidence and trust in the source and quality of the article.