A man named Hochul who helps make rules in New York wants to change how much money people have to pay when they buy weed. Right now, the more strong the weed is, the more money people have to pay extra. This makes it hard for some people to sell weed because of all the rules and taxes. Hochul thinks that if there is less extra money to pay for making the weed stronger, then more people will buy from legal places instead of buying from illegal places where they can't control how good or safe the weed is. Other states like Colorado have done this before and made more money than New York. The new rule might help make it easier for people to sell weed and for us to know if the weed is safe. Read from source...

1. The article title is misleading and clickbaity, implying that legalizing marijuana would eliminate the black market entirely, which is not true or supported by evidence. A more accurate title could be "Cheaper Weed, Less Black Market: How New York's Tax Reform Could Reduce Marijuana Illegal Trade".
2. The article uses anecdotal and unscientific sources, such as Allan Gandelman of the Cannabis Association of New York, who has a vested interest in the cannabis industry and may not be impartial or objective. More credible sources from academic, governmental, or independent organizations should be used to support the claims.
3. The article relies heavily on quotations from advocates of marijuana legalization, such as David Koch, without providing any counterarguments or balanced perspectives from opponents or critics of the policy change. This creates a one-sided and biased presentation of the issue, which could undermine its credibility and persuasiveness for readers who are not already convinced by the pro-legalization arguments.
4. The article assumes that legalizing marijuana would be beneficial for public health, without addressing the potential risks or harms associated with increased consumption, such as addiction, impaired driving, mental health problems, or respiratory issues. A more nuanced and balanced discussion of the pros and cons of legalization should be included in the article, weighing the benefits against the costs and considering different perspectives and evidence.
5. The article uses emotional language and appeals to fear, such as "unregulated products pose health risks due to potential contaminants" or "illicit market where we get nothing", without providing any concrete data or facts to support these claims. This could be seen as a manipulative or sensationalist tactic to sway the readers' emotions and opinions, rather than persuading them with rational and logical arguments.

Positive

Key points:
- New York Gov. Hochul proposes to eliminate the potency tax on marijuana and replace it with a wholesale tax
- The move is aimed at reducing the black market, increasing competitiveness, and fostering smaller business success
- Industry experts welcome the change as a positive shift towards simplicity and transparency

Summary:
The article reports on Gov. Hochul's plan to scrap the complex potency tax on marijuana and implement a simpler wholesale tax instead. The new policy is expected to benefit both the legal market and consumers by reducing the black market, enhancing competitiveness, and promoting smaller business growth. Industry experts praise the change as a step in the right direction for the cannabis sector in New York.