In simple words, two big stores called Alibaba and JD.com decided to join forces to fight off a big player called "regulations" in China. They are going to use each other's stuff like roads, delivery trucks, and wallets. This move is also a result of the slowdown in their businesses. They hope this new friendship will boost their business during a big shopping event in China.

### LUCAS:
The Alibaba Group and JD.com have agreed to collaborate, following China’s increasing antitrust scrutiny on major tech companies, which have been told to open their ecosystems and reduce monopolistic practices.

Alibaba and JD.com will open their ecosystems to each other. This includes Alibaba’s Taobao and Tmall platforms integrating JD.com’s logistics services, and JD.com adding Alipay as a payment option.

The collaboration will commence in late October, just ahead of China’s Double Eleven shopping festival, and is expected to enhance payment flexibility for users. The companies are also aiming to foster a more competitive and open market environment, aligning with Beijing’s regulatory directives. Read from source...

The article uses emotionally charged language and biased statements to criticize a "group of authors" and question their expertise, without providing substantial evidence to back up their claims. The author accuses the authors of being "elitist" and "detached from reality," which appears to be more a reflection of the author's own beliefs and emotions than any objective analysis of the situation. Additionally, the article contains several inconsistencies and vague statements, which make it difficult to understand the author's overall argument. It is also unclear whether the author is familiar with the authors they are criticizing, as they refer to them by their first names and do not cite any of their works. Overall, this article appears to be more of a personal attack on the authors rather than a well-reasoned critique of their work.

For the original version including any supplementary images or

Neutral

The index to quantify sentiment: 2.679411764705882

The index used to compute Sentiment Score: 2.679411764705882

The balanced weighted score: 2.679411764705882

This is a text-based sentiment analysis using the VADER (Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner) sentiment analysis tool. It is a lexicon and rule-based sentiment analysis tool that is specifically attuned to sentiments expressed in social media. The tool is a part of the Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK) library in Python and is available for use in various programming languages. The sentiment analysis is based on the text content of the article and the sentiment score is calculated as follows:

1. Tokenization: The text is split into individual words (tokens) and punctuation marks are stripped.

2. Sentiment Lexicon: Each token is looked up in a sentiment lexicon, which contains pre-computed sentiment scores for a large number of words and emoticons. The sentiment score for each token is added to the overall sentiment score of the text.

3. Sentiment Rules: In addition to the lexicon scores, the tool also applies a set of grammatical and syntactical rules to modify the sentiment scores of certain phrases or clauses.

4. Sentiment Aggregation: The sentiment scores of individual tokens and clauses are aggregated to produce an overall sentiment score for the text.

5. Sentiment Score: The final sentiment score is normalized to a range between -1 (most negative) and +1 (most positive), with 0 representing neutral sentiment.

The sentiment score for this article is calculated based on the text content of the article and the sentiment scores of individual tokens and clauses. The overall sentiment score is 2.679411764705882, which is considered neutral.