Hey, friend! So, you know how grown-ups sometimes use big words and talk about things that seem hard to understand? I'll help make this easy for you!

There's a company called Workday. They just told us how much money they made last time we asked (that's what "earnings" means). The other times we asked, they said something different. That's why we call it "surprise," like when Mom brings your favorite ice cream at dinner!

And you know when you want to buy candies with all your pocket money? Workday is like that too! They made a lot of money, so their candy-buying power went up, just like yours when you have more coins in your piggy bank.

But here's the fun part: other grown-ups also asked them how much money they made. Some said Workday would make even more! That's why we call it "upside," like going higher on a slide!

So, people are happy because Workday surprised us with their candy-buying power, and some think they can buy EVEN MORE candies next time! Isn't that exciting? Now you know all about what happened to Workday! 🍬🎊 Read from source...

Based on the provided text, here are some criticisms and observations as if I were analyzing it from a journalistic or academic perspective:

1. **Lack of Original Analysis/Value-Adding Content**: The text is primarily a summary of facts and figures without much original analysis or interpretation. It would be more engaging and informative to see the author's take on why these numbers matter, what trends they point to, or how they compare to industry peers.

2. **Use of Jargon Without Explanation**: Terms like "EPS Surprise" and "Rev Surprise" are used without explanation. For a general audience who might not be familiar with these terms, it would be helpful to define them.

3. **Insufficient Contextualization**: While the text mentions that Workday Inc's stock rose 7.71% after hours, it doesn't provide context such as how this change compares to recent trends in the stock price or the wider market movement.

4. **Lack of Cautionary Notes or Counterarguments**: No mention is made of any potential risks or challenges facing Workday, nor are there any opposing viewpoints presented. Balanced reporting would include these aspects.

5. **Over-reliance on Quotes**: The text heavily relies on quotes from unidentified sources for certain details (e.g., "why it's moving"). It would be more transparent and credible to attribute these insights to named experts or analysts.

6. **Bias Towards Positivity**: While the article doesn't contain outright biases, there is a subtle positivity towards the company. This could be balanced by mentioning any negative aspects of the earnings report or stock performance.

7. **Lack of Visual Aid**: For such data-heavy content, including graphs, charts, or other visual aids would make the information easier to understand and digest.

8. **Promotional Tone Towards Benzinga Services**: The abundance of links directing users towards Benzinga's services shifts the focus from informative journalism to promotional content.

Based on the provided article, here's a breakdown of its sentiment:

1. **Positive**:
- "Workday reported earnings and revenue that beat analysts' expectations."
- "The company's total revenue grew by 13% year over year to $1.47 billion, surpassing the expected $1.45 billion."
- "Earnings per share (EPS) were $1.29, compared to the expected $0.86."

2. **Bullish**:
- The stock price increased by 7.71% in after-hours trading, suggesting investor confidence.
- CEO David Duffield's comments regarding strong business momentum and solid execution contribute to a bullish sentiment.

3. **Neutral**: There are no bearish or negative sentiments expressed in the article.

The overall sentiment of the article is **positive** and **bullish**, as it highlights Workday's strong financial performance and positive outlook, which has led to increased investor confidence reflected in the stock price surge.