Apple and Disney are two big companies that use smart computers called artificial intelligence (AI) to do things like make movies, shows, and products. Some people who care about how these companies use AI want them to be more careful and fair with it. They asked the government to let them vote on this issue at Apple and Disney's big meetings. The government said yes, so they will get a chance to vote and discuss this topic soon. Read from source...

- The title is misleading, as it suggests that shareholder scrutiny is a problem for Apple and Disney, when in fact it could be an opportunity for them to demonstrate their AI strategies and benefits.
- The article does not provide enough context or background on the AI proposals filed by the AFL-CIO, such as why they were filed, what are the main concerns or goals, and how they align with shareholder interests or societal values.
- The article uses vague terms like "AI use", "transparency", "consent", and "compensation" without explaining what they mean in practice, how they are measured, or what implications they have for the companies and their stakeholders.
- The article relies on outdated information, such as the date of the SEC decision (January 3), which is more than a week ago, and does not provide any updates or follow-ups on the developments or reactions from the companies or the AFL-CIO.
- The article fails to present any balanced perspectives or counterarguments from other sources, such as experts, analysts, investors, consumers, or competitors, who might have different opinions or insights on the AI proposals and their implications.

Neutral. The article is informative and does not express a strong opinion or bias towards either Apple or Disney. It simply reports the facts about the SEC decision and the AI proposals filed by the labor union federation.

Summary (in your own words): Apple and Disney are facing shareholder votes on their use of artificial intelligence after the SEC denied their requests to exclude AI-related proposals from their annual meetings. These proposals, submitted by a pension trust of the AFL-CIO, seek transparency, consent, and compensation regarding the companies' use of AI in their business operations.

Apple and Disney are both facing shareholder votes on their AI strategies due to the SEC denying their requests to exclude AI-related proposals from their annual meetings. The proposals, filed by a pension trust of the AFL-CIO, call for reports on Apple and Disney's use of AI in their business operations and any ethical concerns related to it. This situation poses risks for both companies as they may face pressure from shareholders to improve their AI policies or face potential consequences such as reputational damage or regulatory actions. On the other hand, this also presents opportunities for both companies to demonstrate their commitment to transparency, consent, and compensation in their use of AI, which could attract more investors and customers who value these aspects. Therefore, a possible comprehensive investment recommendation would be to buy shares of Apple and Disney as long as they can prove their compliance with the AI-related proposals and show positive results from their AI strategies. Alternatively, one could also consider shorting shares of Apple and Disney if they fail to meet these expectations or face significant backlash from shareholders or regulators.