Sure, let's imagine you're playing a big game with your friends, and you all have to make some important decisions together. This is kind of like when grown-ups make laws in a country.

1. **System duties, allowable expenses, compensation limitations, and ethics requirements:** These are the rules for how everyone should behave while they're playing the game. They say things like: You can't use your special powers (like being really smart or rich) to influence the other players too much. And you have to tell everyone if you might gain something from a decision that's being made.

2. **The New York Times says Musk and his companies get a lot of help from the government:** This is like one player always getting extra candy (help) from the referee (the government). Some people think this isn't fair, because now Musk can influence the game even more!

3. **Wedbush's AI Ives said something interesting:** He said that since Musk isn't a real official in the game (like being on a team instead of just helping out), he gets to keep playing his other games (being CEO of Tesla and SpaceX). This is like saying, "It's okay if you help us make decisions, but you can still run your own businesses too."

4. **Congress' Role:** Congress is like the referees in our game. They want everyone to work together fairly and quickly, without costing too much money. And they want all the rules to be clear so everyone can understand them.

5. **Appointing Committee Members:** The people who pick the team (the president or others) have to choose players from lots of different backgrounds. This is like saying, "We need a mix of kids with different toys and skills." Everyone wants to make sure all voices are heard and no one person gets too much power.

So, Musk getting involved in federal commissions might be complicated because he has so many businesses that the government helps. And if he's not playing by the usual rules (because it's a new game), some people might wonder if things will stay fair and safe for everyone else. Read from source...

It appears that you're using a format that's not supported. Let's try rephrasing the prompt in a clear and concise manner:

**Prompt:**

Analyze the following paragraph from AI, citing specific issues such as inconsistencies, biases, irrational arguments, or emotional appeals:

"Since this is not an official Cabinet or US government position and it's essentially newly created, there will be NO changes to Musk’s CEO roles with Tesla and SpaceX importantly from the Street’s perspective."

**Helpful Hints:**
- Be specific about which aspects of the paragraph you're criticizing.
- Use evidence and reasoning to support your critiques.
- Avoid making personal attacks or using emotional language.

The sentiment of the article is predominantly **neutral**, as it presents facts and potential implications without expressing a strong opinion. Here are some sentiments detected in specific parts:

- **Neutral:** The article mainly provides information about newly appointed advisory council members by Trump, their backgrounds, potential conflicts of interest, and regulatory requirements.
- **Informative/Positive:** It mentions the U.S. General Services Administration rules aiming for diverse and fairly balanced committee memberships, suggesting a positive aspect of fairness in representation.
- **Cautious/Concerned:** The article discusses potential conflicts of interest arising from Musk's role due to his businesses' reliance on federal contracts and ongoing investigations.

Overall, the intent is not to sway the reader towards or against any specific view but rather inform them about the situation and its potential impacts.

Based on the provided information, here's a comprehensive overview of potential obligations, duties, and considerations for Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy participating in a federal technology commission:

1. **System Obligations, Duties, and Ethics Requirements:**
- As non-federal officials, they are not bound by federal disclosure and divestment requirements (like the STOCK Act). However, they should comply with any conflict of interest policies set forth by the commission or the administering agency.
- They should disclose any potential conflicts of interest related to their businesses (SpaceX, Tesla for Musk; Nexstar Media Group for Ramaswamy).
- They must ensure that their participation in the commission does not result in an unfair competitive advantage for their businesses.
- They should avoid improprieties such as providing non-public information about their companies to the federal government or vice versa.

2. **Allowable Expenses and Compensation Limitations:**
- Members of advisory committees are reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred while performing duties ( tels GSA's guidelines). This includes travel, per diem allowances, etc.
- There is no statutory limitation on compensation for advisory committee members. However, the administering agency may have their own policies or budgetary constraints.

3. **Congress' Role and FACA Requirements:**
- The Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) requires that the commission's advice be relevant, objective, and open to the public.
- The commission should act promptly and comply with reasonable cost controls and record-keeping requirements.
- As per FACA, committee memberships should be "fairly balanced in terms of the points of view represented" and members are selected based on their backgrounds and qualifications.

4. **Conflict of Interest Concerns:**
- Musk's companies receiving federal contracts worth billions in 2023 raises concerns about potential conflicts.
- There may be public perception issues due to multiple federal investigations involving Musk's businesses, which could impact the commission's credibility.

5. **Market Reaction and Analyst Views:**
- Wedbush analyst AI Ives believes that there will "NO changes" to Musk’s CEO roles with Tesla and SpaceX as this is not an official government position.
- The stock market may react based on perceived impacts of their participation, such as influences on regulatory policies or changes in public sentiment towards their companies.

6. **Congress' Role in Appointing Committee Members:**
- While the final selection is made by the president or heads of departments/agencies, Congress has a say in the overall process through legislative oversight and funding decisions for advisory committees.
- They can influence the committee's establishment, scope, and membership via hearings, appropriations, and legislation.