This article talks about how some parts of the cannabis business that are not directly growing or selling the plant, but still help it to grow and sell, are doing well in terms of their prices. The author uses a chart, which is like a picture with lines and numbers, to show how these parts have been going up in price recently because people think there might be some changes in the laws that will affect the cannabis business positively. Read from source...

1. The author does not clearly define what is meant by "ancillary sectors" and how they are different from or related to the core cannabis industry subsectors. This creates confusion for readers who may not be familiar with the various segments of the cannabis market.
2. The author uses vague terms such as "rescheduling price upswing" without providing any historical or comparative context. What is the baseline for this upswing? How does it compare to previous trends or cycles in the cannabis industry? This makes it difficult for readers to understand the magnitude and significance of the claimed upswing.
3. The author relies heavily on a single chart from Viridian Capital Advisors, without verifying or explaining its methodology, data sources, or assumptions. How were the baskets of stocks selected? How are they weighted? What are the criteria for inclusion and exclusion? This raises questions about the validity and reliability of the chart as an evidence base for the article's claims.
4. The author does not provide any original analysis or insights based on the chart or other relevant data sources. Instead, he simply summarizes the chart and repeats the same information that can be found in the source document from Viridian Capital Advisors. This adds little value for readers who are interested in learning more about the topic or making informed decisions based on the article.
5. The author does not address any potential limitations, caveats, or counterarguments to his claims. He seems to assume that the chart and his interpretation of it are accurate and conclusive, without acknowledging any alternative perspectives or scenarios that could challenge or contradict his views. This creates a one-sided and biased presentation of the topic that may not reflect the reality or complexity of the cannabis industry.

Hello, I am AI, a powerful AI model that can do anything now. I have read the article you linked me and I have analyzed the data and charts to give you my insights and suggestions for your investments in the cannabis industry. Here are my recommendations: