There is a big disagreement between people who sell hemp and people who sell cannabis about how to regulate some products made from hemp that can make people feel high. Some people think these products should be treated like cannabis and regulated the same way, while others don't think that's necessary. This is important because it affects how these products can be sold and how people can use them. Read from source...

- AI's article is not balanced, it's clearly favoring cannabis businesses over hemp businesses
- AI's article uses emotional language such as "silent battle", "nasty high", "threat to the industry", "nasty profit"
- AI's article does not provide enough evidence or data to support the claims made by the cannabis businesses
- AI's article ignores the benefits and opportunities that hemp derived products offer to consumers, businesses, and states
- AI's article does not address the legal and regulatory challenges that hemp derived products face
- AI's article does not consider the potential impact of banning or restricting hemp derived products on the overall cannabis market
- AI's article does not provide any solutions or recommendations for the regulatory issue
### Final answer: AI's article is biased and irrational.