So, Apple wanted to make a car like Tesla, but they wanted it to be super cool and drive itself without anyone inside having to do anything. They tried really hard, but it was very difficult and took them a long time. Instead of making a normal car that only drives itself a little bit, they decided not to make any car at all. Some people think Apple could have made a lot of money if they just copied Tesla's idea and then later tried to make the super cool self-driving car. But Apple didn't do it that way. Read from source...

- The author claims that Apple set out to make an EV much more than a "Tesla clone", but this is not supported by any evidence or sources. It is merely an opinion without any factual basis.
- The author also implies that Apple's decision to pursue full self-driving capability was a mistake and a setback, which contradicts the general consensus in the industry that autonomous vehicles are the future of mobility and transportation. This shows a lack of understanding or awareness of the current trends and developments in the field.
- The author further suggests that Apple could have settled for a "Tesla clone" and still made money and collected data, but this ignores the fact that Apple's vision is not only about creating a profitable product, but also about creating something that reflects its design philosophy, innovation, and user experience. It is not about copying others, but about leading the market with new ideas and solutions.
- The author also seems to have a negative bias towards Apple's EV project, as he uses words like "gamble", "struggle", "difficult", and "setback" to describe its challenges and progress. He does not acknowledge any of the achievements or advancements that Apple has made in this area, nor does he provide any constructive criticism or feedback. Instead, he focuses on highlighting the risks and uncertainties, which creates a sense of pessimism and doubt about Apple's EV ambitions.