The former boss of Microsoft's Windows, Steven Sinofsky, thinks that the lawsuit filed by Apple against the DOJ is very strange. He compares it to his own experience with a similar situation when Microsoft was sued by the government for antitrust issues. He says that usually, big companies like Apple and Microsoft are not allowed to do whatever they want, because they have too much power in the market. The government wants to make sure that there is fair competition between all the different companies that sell products or services. But sometimes, the rules can be confusing or even unfair, and companies may fight back against them by going to court. That's what Apple did with this lawsuit, and it makes Mr. Sinofsky think of his own past when Microsoft was in a similar situation. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that the former Windows head had a direct opinion on the lawsuit, but he only said it was "so weird" without providing any reasoning or evidence to support his claim. This creates a false impression of disagreement or controversy where there might not be any. 2. The article focuses too much on the personal history and background of Steven Sinofsky, who is irrelevant to the topic at hand. It mentions that he witnessed the Microsoft antitrust trial, but does not explain how that relates to Apple's DOJ lawsuit or what insights he could offer based on his experience. Instead, it gives unnecessary details about his education and career, which do not add any value to the readers. 3. The article uses vague and ambiguous terms like "so weird", "very different", "hard to compare" without defining or clarifying them. This makes the argument less coherent and convincing. For example, what does it mean for a lawsuit to be "weird"? How are Apple's and Microsoft's cases "very different"? What aspects are they differing on? The article should provide specific examples or evidence to support such claims instead of relying on subjective impressions. 4. The article does not provide any balanced or objective perspective on the lawsuit. It only quotes the former Windows head, who has a clear bias against Apple and Google, as he accuses them of being "monopolists" in the past. It does not include any counterarguments or opinions from other experts, legal scholars, or stakeholders who might have different views on the issue. This creates a one-sided and incomplete picture of the situation that could mislead or misinform the readers. 5. The article ends with a promotional section for Benzinga Neuro, which is unrelated to the topic and seems to be an attempt to generate revenue from the traffic. This is inappropriate and unethical, as it violates the principle of journalistic integrity and credibility. It also shows a lack of respect for the readers' intelligence and time, as it tries to divert their attention from the main content with a dubious offer. 6. The article does not follow any clear structure or logic. It jumps from one topic to another without transitions or connections. It starts with the former Windows head's comment, then moves on to his background and history, then briefly mentions the lawsuit, then ends with an unrelated promotion. This makes the article confusing and hard to follow, as it does not convey a coherent message or argument. 7. The article uses outdated and inaccurate information. For example, it says that Apple is suing Epic Games for removing Fortnite from the App Store,

To help you make the best decisions, I have analyzed the article titled `Apple's DOJ Lawsuit 'So Weird,' Says Former Windows Head Who Witnessed Microsoft Antitrust Trial`. Here are my key findings and suggestions.

Key Findings:
- The former Windows head, Steven Sinofsky, said that Apple's DOJ lawsuit is "so weird" because it reminds him of the Microsoft antitrust trial in the late 1990s and early 2000s. He said that both cases involved similar issues, such as monopoly power, bundling, and exclusive deals with partners.
- The article also mentions that Apple is facing scrutiny from regulators over its App Store policies, which require developers to use its own payment system and prohibit them from offering alternative options. This has been challenged by Epic Games, the maker of Fortnite, which sued Apple for antitrust violations and lost the case in court.
- The article suggests that Apple may have to change some of its practices to avoid further legal troubles and maintain its reputation as a innovator and leader in the tech industry. It also implies that Apple's App Store policies are not necessarily beneficial for consumers or developers, as they limit competition and choice.